Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well the first pass i have ever had in the car and it was an experience :happy: it left the line pretty lazy then at the 60 foot mark it turned hard right and nearly put me into the wall

so i got off it and got back on it and went 9.9 @ 147 the car felt very strong so now its off to get a cage and chute and we will try again.

car weighed 1601 with driver and full trim.

A big thanx to cv performance and steve from bms transmissions

now i can put my RH9GTR plates on hahahaha

60 foot was 1.6 i will post up time slip tomorrow

Edited by superjet760
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/295909-first-pass-99-147mph-full-trim/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Very impressive car....

It was amazing to see a car in full trim and at the 60 foot mark break traction...

Then to get off it and still run a 9.9

Wow!!!!

I recorded the pass on my camera but don't know how to upload it.

It shows the car backing off....

Would have at least lost 0.5-1sec

So it shows the has alot more in it...

Congrats Paul...... And well done for making it into the RH9 club....

We havent done any full passes yet but hope to get some done in a couple of weeks time. We only had 1 launch with times which was 1.4 to 60ft which was a bit soft, the next launch was hard lifting the fronts and seemed to be quicker but no times were recorded as he had already deep staged and bought up the red light.

Here is the time slip

I wonder how emasculated the guy in the other lane was?

He would have pulled a healthy lead out the hole, but then you would have blown past him like he wasn't moving by the time you "got around" to actually driving.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...