Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just wondering if the correction values are right on my car, my car when running at operating temp will only go over 80deg on hot day or leaft to sit in traffic. In my water temp settings the correction value 1.00 is set at 80deg does that mean that the car will only run full power wehn above 80????

hope that make sence

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/296467-power-fc-water-temp-settings/
Share on other sites

Nah its got nothing to do with power, the values are fuel corrections. 1.00 means there is no correction 1.10 means 10% and 1.20 means 20% all numbers over 1.00 are adding fuel, corrections like 0.90 are 10% deductions.

Edited by URAS

Ok, I think I got it, however if its adding fuel then would it start to run rich most of the time then therefore not potentially running richer AFR etc possibly loose power? At normal running temps my car will not go over 80deg only if its been sitting in traffic and heat soaking. so I may change it to 78 and see what happens.

Just leave the over 80deg at 1.00 on low load and 1.00 on high load which is the left and right columns. For the next lowest temp which is over60deg I think, leave it also at 1.00 left column and 1.00 right column. You will save a lot of fuel and your car will run cleaner as a result. After that though, you will have to add a little fuel for best results. Took me around 9mths to slowly get it right. I get 450k's on average around town and 450 to 620 on long trips. You also need to look at accell pump and drastically reduce the numbers for best results.

you cant change the temp values, only the correction at those temps the next one below 80 is 50, i've changed myne to 1.00 at 50 (car never gets to 80) and it drives perfectly. just dont thrash it until its close to full temp.

what temp does your car run at? the power fc interpolates between the temps, meaning if it has 1.00 at 80C and 1.30 at 50C then it'll be 1.20 at 60C and 1.10 at 70C etc. if your cars getting up to 78 it'll be so close to 1.00 it wont make any noticeable difference

hmm this is all rather interesting.. so if its over 80 @ 1.00 would u decrease? or increase?

ps. mine never goes over 80, highest i see it is 78, normally its on about 74 during everyday driving on a hot summer day. I will see 81-83 on a track day.

got you, can only change correction value, and it wont be much anyway will have a look on the way home now and put it up.

cheers Ben

Just be aware that adjustments should only be done if the tune needs it. Just leave the over 80deg at 1.00 in the left and right column. It would have to be a really hot day and you would have to be very fussy to want to change that. The next temp down which apparently is 60deg should also be 1.00 or at most 1.003 in the left column. The right column is for high load and will almost definately not need any change. If you really know your car then you will feel the difference even if you adjust by .010. Just never use someone elses tune as a guide, make a small adjustment and see how it goes.

Start at say, temp 10+ when you start it in the morning and gradually trim this setting till the car starts to feel doey when you drive off. You will gradually get better fuel economy and if need be add 1 or 2 richer to get it perfect. Move to the next one above and start the process again. I have my car running almost the same first thing in the morning as when warm.

Remember, left column light load so thats where you need to tune the most unless you thrash your car when cold.

hmm this is all rather interesting.. so if its over 80 @ 1.00 would u decrease? or increase?
you cant change the temp values, only the correction at those temps the next one below 80 is 50

unless someones done some funky shit every power fc's setting should be 1.00 in both colums at 80C.

the next one down from that is 50C and the standard pfc settings (RB20 and 25) for that are 1.094 at 1792 (~P3) load and 1.156 at 8960 (~P13) load

if you have trouble with your car reaching 80C then try lowering the values for 50C but leave 80 at 1.00

Edited by JonnoHR31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...