Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just wondering if the correction values are right on my car, my car when running at operating temp will only go over 80deg on hot day or leaft to sit in traffic. In my water temp settings the correction value 1.00 is set at 80deg does that mean that the car will only run full power wehn above 80????

hope that make sence

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/296467-power-fc-water-temp-settings/
Share on other sites

Nah its got nothing to do with power, the values are fuel corrections. 1.00 means there is no correction 1.10 means 10% and 1.20 means 20% all numbers over 1.00 are adding fuel, corrections like 0.90 are 10% deductions.

Edited by URAS

Ok, I think I got it, however if its adding fuel then would it start to run rich most of the time then therefore not potentially running richer AFR etc possibly loose power? At normal running temps my car will not go over 80deg only if its been sitting in traffic and heat soaking. so I may change it to 78 and see what happens.

Just leave the over 80deg at 1.00 on low load and 1.00 on high load which is the left and right columns. For the next lowest temp which is over60deg I think, leave it also at 1.00 left column and 1.00 right column. You will save a lot of fuel and your car will run cleaner as a result. After that though, you will have to add a little fuel for best results. Took me around 9mths to slowly get it right. I get 450k's on average around town and 450 to 620 on long trips. You also need to look at accell pump and drastically reduce the numbers for best results.

you cant change the temp values, only the correction at those temps the next one below 80 is 50, i've changed myne to 1.00 at 50 (car never gets to 80) and it drives perfectly. just dont thrash it until its close to full temp.

what temp does your car run at? the power fc interpolates between the temps, meaning if it has 1.00 at 80C and 1.30 at 50C then it'll be 1.20 at 60C and 1.10 at 70C etc. if your cars getting up to 78 it'll be so close to 1.00 it wont make any noticeable difference

hmm this is all rather interesting.. so if its over 80 @ 1.00 would u decrease? or increase?

ps. mine never goes over 80, highest i see it is 78, normally its on about 74 during everyday driving on a hot summer day. I will see 81-83 on a track day.

got you, can only change correction value, and it wont be much anyway will have a look on the way home now and put it up.

cheers Ben

Just be aware that adjustments should only be done if the tune needs it. Just leave the over 80deg at 1.00 in the left and right column. It would have to be a really hot day and you would have to be very fussy to want to change that. The next temp down which apparently is 60deg should also be 1.00 or at most 1.003 in the left column. The right column is for high load and will almost definately not need any change. If you really know your car then you will feel the difference even if you adjust by .010. Just never use someone elses tune as a guide, make a small adjustment and see how it goes.

Start at say, temp 10+ when you start it in the morning and gradually trim this setting till the car starts to feel doey when you drive off. You will gradually get better fuel economy and if need be add 1 or 2 richer to get it perfect. Move to the next one above and start the process again. I have my car running almost the same first thing in the morning as when warm.

Remember, left column light load so thats where you need to tune the most unless you thrash your car when cold.

hmm this is all rather interesting.. so if its over 80 @ 1.00 would u decrease? or increase?
you cant change the temp values, only the correction at those temps the next one below 80 is 50

unless someones done some funky shit every power fc's setting should be 1.00 in both colums at 80C.

the next one down from that is 50C and the standard pfc settings (RB20 and 25) for that are 1.094 at 1792 (~P3) load and 1.156 at 8960 (~P13) load

if you have trouble with your car reaching 80C then try lowering the values for 50C but leave 80 at 1.00

Edited by JonnoHR31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...