Jump to content
SAU Community

Idles Drops When Rev!

gL3nJaMiN88

By gL3nJaMiN88,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

gL3nJaMiN88 Collaborator

gL3nJaMiN88

Posted
Posted

the last few months i've had nothing but problems with my R33 . Right now i've got this stupid idle issue when the car is hot, not when its cold. What the car does is it starts fine and revs and a nice steady rate, but as soon as you blip the throttle anywhere past 3000rpm the revs go under 500 to around 0 then bounce up to 500 then back to 0 sounding like a rotory and pissing black smoke trying to save stalling then it goes back to normal. Ive cleaned my AAC Valve 2 times with good carby cleaner , new gasket for the AAC valve , New Plenum gasket , Ive cleaned the throttle body and i've positioned the TPS to what is says in Nissan RB25 workshop manual which is 0.40v. I've got a brand new Bosch 02 genuine and just bout done everything . I've searched every forum and NOBODY is having the same issues! .. I've adjusted idle with the gay TPS unplugged like it says in idle and im running PowerFC so i cant adjust it on the ECU .

NOW the only way to stop the rev hunting issue when i rev the car is to adjust that scew thingo that pushed the Butterfly open or closed on the throttle body , so my car revs at 1500RPM and eveything is fine! it revs nice and comes straight back and sits on the rev and doesnt drop! . The car even feels better to drive as it doesnt stall when i boost 1st gear and then back to neutral ..

But the only issue i dont want my freakin car to idle at 1500!!! i want it to idle at 750RPM at the most..

Not one mechanical workshop knows what im talking about and probably half you guys wont but there must be a solution before i run this car off the cliff and sell the scrap

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/299402-idles-drops-when-rev/
Share on other sites
gL3nJaMiN88 Collaborator

gL3nJaMiN88

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I already moved that thing!! where should it be? it doesnt state it in the manual??? and i already said i cleaned the AAC Valve 2 times? and i mean really cleaned it with freakin cotton wool buds and carby clean+ compressed air! .. what else can contribute?

gL3nJaMiN88 Collaborator

gL3nJaMiN88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
its your blow off valve and its called pcf disease . do a search

how about you do a search under the description i have wrote? you wont find shit! i just want my freakin car to work and my blow off valve was blocked off in the test and did the same thing , i just tried my stock one and it is the same so its not that

Penfold Rising Star

Penfold

Posted
Posted (edited)

My car did a similar thing with warm starts with the PowerFC where it would hunt. I ended up using datalogit to try to relearn the start up procedure but it got worse. Took it to the tuner and they said it was leaning out which was causing the problem. They fixed it up and ever since its been fine.

Edited by Penfold
boostn0199 Grand Master

boostn0199

Posted
Posted

its either your bov or if you have bloked off your bov and the recirc pipe is bloked off aswel it will do this just set ur idle to like 800 from the powerfc settings not the way you did and it will be alright

Bunta Grand Master

Bunta

Posted
Posted

I have had a similar problem on 2 occasions

1) it was an air leak, check all your piping

2) dead airflow meter and busted wiring to the AFM

Cant promise your case is the same but it would be worth checking out

lachlanw Veteran

lachlanw

Posted
Posted

there is a new thread every week along these lines . its either an air leak ( block the afm and pump up the whole system with air compressor ) or its power fc disease . it it to do with air reversion back out the air flow meter . when you rev it up engine sucks in air when you let off the air has to go somehwere some goes out the blow off valve or in your case it all goes backwards out the air flow meter and as the air flow meter and ecu dont know the difference between air flowing in and air flowing out it sees air going in and puts lots of fuel in .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      RB20DE NEO smallbox clutch.

      By Kapr · Posted

      For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...