Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I know this has most likely been talked about 1000 times but i need some info...

I understand that this allows you to suck more air as they are designed to suck more air than the RB20 AFM...????

What is the purpose of the upgrade... I wanna get 200KW @ the rears.... shopuld i be doing this upgrade to acheive this goal... someone give me info pleez.... loatsa DETAILED info...

cheers guys,

Dave.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30068-z32-afm/
Share on other sites

Well my first reaction was going to be to tell you to search, but I tried searching myself and there's too much other Z32-related stuff to make it easy to find anything. So I'll try to sum it up in here, and hopefully other people searching in future will be able to find it too. Also hopefully I'm not too far off the mark, anyone with corrections please let me know! (heh, as if you wouldn't let me know I'm wrong anyway)

Your AFM outputs between 0 and 5 volts, depending on the amount of airflow. On an RB25 AFM, it reads 0.5 volts or so at idle, and 5 volts at some pre-assigned amount of airflow, which usually works out to around 210rwkw. It's less on the RB20 AFM I presume.

When the amount of airflow causes the AFM to hit 5 volts, it is said to have "maxed out" and won't go any higher. Your ECU usually interprets this as a message to dump as much fuel as possible in to avoid leaning out.

A Z32/VG30 AFM has a finer resolution, and caters for more airflow. So at 5 volts, it's not 210rwkw, but say around 260rwkw. So the point of upgrading to a Z32 AFM isn't for more power, but for more tuneability for the ECU to be able to read the fairly large gap between 210 and 260rwkw. If running off the old AFM the ECU would just be dumping fuel in and you'd get a really bad power curve and waste a lot of fuel.

If your goal is only 200rwkw, you might want to consider the much cheaper RB25 AFM instead. It's the same physical size as the Z32 AFM, but will support a bit more than your power goal. The R33/Z32 AFMs are bigger than the R32 AFM, but that's not the main point of the upgrade.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30068-z32-afm/#findComment-611697
Share on other sites

I've been told all over the place that Z32=higher resolution AND higher airflow capacity. But I get what you're saying. If I've been misinformed then you should use the AFM with the closest limits to your wanted power goals.

Whatever the case I'd be getting an R33 AFM for only 200rwkw, just to save around $200.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30068-z32-afm/#findComment-611756
Share on other sites

I agree with Sydneykid, from all the cars I have seen RB20/RB25 AFM seem to do pretty much the same thing? And its the Z32 offers the greater resolution

Don't know about more flow, they are pretty well the same size aren't they? I know SR/CA AFM's are tiny compared to the RB AFM's, but all of the RB AFM's, apart from GTR's which seem smaller, are the same size from what I have seen?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30068-z32-afm/#findComment-612992
Share on other sites

I thought they were all about 80mm.

I think maybe that some of the terms used to describe the characteristics are often misused and interchanged which causes confusion.

My understanding is that:

Resolution is the minimum measurable interval

Range is the difference between minimum and maximum readings.

So the Z32 AFM can measure a greater range of airflows and give a useful output.

The resolution on the other hand will be determined by the electronic trickery in the AFM. The ECU may even limit the resolution depending on how sensitive it is and how it interprets the input signal.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30068-z32-afm/#findComment-613090
Share on other sites

Hi guys, AFM diameters follow;

R32/33 GTR = 65 mm (X 2)

R32/33 GTST = 80 mm (X 1)

Z32 = 80 mm (X 1)

Q45 = 90 mm (X 1)

It is a simple logic really, I explain it like this;

Z32 AFM - 3.0 litre at 6,000 rpm & 1 bar = 4 volts

RB25DET AFM - 2.5 litre at 6,000 rpm & 1 bar = 4 volts

Thus Z32 AFM (3.0 litre) needs 16% more airflow to read 4 volts on a 2.5 litre at the same boost and RPM. Or you can look at it the other way around. The Z32 AFM will only show 3.4 volts when a RB25DET AFM would show 4 volts.

Since they both max out at around 5 volts, you can have 16% more airflow before a Z32 AFM will max out compared to a RB25DET AFM.

Rough maths, but not far from the real world experiences.

Hope that helps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30068-z32-afm/#findComment-613183
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hmmm. Time to resurrect an old thread.

Is there any point to upgrading the AFMs on an R32 GT-R from stock items to Z32 or Q45 items? Do they make any difference on their own, or only in conjunction with other mods?

Edit: Just to be clear, it would obviously be in conjunction with a PFC, but basically no other mods except maybe exhaust.

Cheers,

Lucien.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30068-z32-afm/#findComment-803634
Share on other sites

Hmmm. Time to resurrect an old thread.

Is there any point to upgrading the AFMs on an R32 GT-R from stock items to Z32 or Q45 items? Do they make any difference on their own, or only in conjunction with other mods?

Edit: Just to be clear, it would obviously be in conjunction with a PFC, but basically no  other mods except maybe exhaust.

Cheers,

Lucien.

Basically Lucien, it would be a waist of time and money until you get to the limit of resolution of the standard GTR (65 mm) AFM's. And that's a bit over 300 rwkw, which you won't get any where near with just a PFC and an exhaust.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30068-z32-afm/#findComment-803650
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...