Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Troy,

Thanks for your input, i have been extremely pleased with turbosmart and how they have handled the issue with my gate. I have yet to road test it, but when i put the gate back on yesterday and pressure tested the system again, there was not even the hint of a leak from where it was leaking previously, so for that i am very grateful. However, i will give you feedback as soon as i drive it again.

I will pm you a link, which i am keen for you to read, not for my benefit, just an interesting read.

Now as for the AFR's. That is a valid point you have raised about the plug fouling. however, i will call the dyno back and get them to checkup what AFR it was running, but from memory it actually leaned off after 7k rpm. nothing richer than 11-11.5. The one thing that i do recall, which i no doubt feel is a problem, was just as it was being backed onto the dyno, the engine was stalled and took a lot of cranking to start again. When it did, it smelled very fuelled up. So i can only guess it fouled a plug before the first run. The plugs came out when i comp tested it and we cleaned them there and then. It proceeded to make normal power again.

The plugs im using are NGK racing competition B8EGV. They are a fine tipped plug.

In addition Troy, those runs are layed over each other, but are from 2 weeks apart. Before i noticed the issue and then after.

My concern in all of this is im worried about what consequences this may have on the 4th pot. I know the plenum design isn't great but like i said before, it have had plugs running the same before.

G

I just re checked the leads for resistance and moved them around and found the following.

#1 - 12-13

#2 - 15-16

#3 - 18-19 (up to 20 depending on how i hold the lead)

#4 - 13-14 (up to 16, 17)

G

  • 4 weeks later...

Gareth - congrats on building something like that - the plenum i mean - at the age of 16...there are plenty out there (and on here that have never done anything apart from bolt on an air filter or intercooler and think they know it all.

The plenum would cause the rich mixtures in cylinder 4 as you are experiencing. The turbelence created at the rear of the plenum is the reason for this - turbulence or air pockets reduce flow and result in the rich mixtures. This is typical of that style of plenum. Strangely all the top 2jz race teams, here and in the US run this style but also have the luxury of adjusting fuel mixtures per cylinder to overcome this....personally not the ideal way, but whatever works for some people is enough.

Simply run mixtures that air safe for cylinders 1-3 and that will bandaid fix that issue.

dont run b8egv's its not a rotor. you need to use plain old bpr7e's, you will find it will feel much stronger the whole way thru.

and with your plenum. much of muchness. getting a stock one will yield gains. both off and on boost.

it may pay to have your "end of injection" timing looked at, i mean they should fire at a closed inlet valve to get the best mixture and stable combustion.

also, this may sound funny but all the injectors are wired in corectly? in firing order? not 1234 but 1342 at the ecu. aka inj output at ecu,1 to 1, 2 to 3, 3 to 4 and 4 to 2?

only thing is that the stock plenum suffers from the same, or well at least to a simlar extent, as does the one there now. cylinders 1-3 flow quite evenly but 4 is just over 10% less than the others

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...