Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Doing a bit of research I discovered that the A32/A33 Maxima has a 72mm TB, which is the size I want to use on a forward facing plenum when I get one.

Would anybody with a suitable plenum (Greddy, Plazmaman, etc) on their RB25 be willing to lend a hand to see if this TB will fit? If my idea works it could save a few people hundreds of dollars as you wouldn't have to buy a billet CNC item for silly amounts of cash.

This won't be until after Xmas but let me know if you're happy to help out - i'll bring beers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/300954-rb25-plenum-tb-experiment/
Share on other sites

you can get an adapter to fit the stock throttle body to the Greddy plenum or just fit a Q45 throttle body. why go to the effort of reinventing the wheel?

Having spoken to Plazmaman they recommended the 72mm TB over an 80mm or 90mm item for better response, so that's what i'm planning on using. Given that a lot of Nissan parts are interchangable I'd thought I'd see if this would work on one of their plenums. If the bolt hole locations are different I'll see how much TRD will charge to machine an adapter plate. The last thing I had them machine for me was insanely cheap, so I doubt this will cost much. All up I reckon it would be cheaper than a Plazmaman TB ($500) to buy the part I want & have an adapter machined.

Why spend $500 when i don't have to?

why not just buy the plenum from plazmaman that fits the std TB?

and of course he will tell you that "his" 72mm squillion dollar TB is better than an ebay 80mm one or the standard one.

In my experience changing throttle bodies on car that doesnt have ITBs does sweet FA especially boosted ones....there are plently of 350rwkw+ rb25s running around with the standard intake/TB combo

why not just buy the plenum from plazmaman that fits the std TB?

and of course he will tell you that "his" 72mm squillion dollar TB is better than an ebay 80mm one or the standard one.

In my experience changing throttle bodies on car that doesnt have ITBs does sweet FA especially boosted ones....there are plently of 350rwkw+ rb25s running around with the standard intake/TB combo

Standard TB is 60mm, 72mm should give better response - that's the aim for the car as I'm not into dyno figures & dick measuring kw contests, I just want the car to be very responsive for drifting.

Naturally Plazmaman have given me a sales pitch to sell their own TB at 3billion % mark up, so I'm trying to find an alternative. If my plan doesn't work i've lost all of $60 getting the part from Japan (Aussie wreckers wanted $110 or more incl delivery) and can still put the standard TB on.

I've never heard of anybody trying to do this before so I thought I'd give it a shot. Somebody has to think outside the box, otherwise we'd all get ripped off more often.

Im all for giving it a go mate :D

just saying that dont expect a massive difference, do you have a pic of how the cable mount etc are.

the maxima is FWD so the donk is mounted East-West so while the bolt holes might line up, but there may be a lot of stuffing around getting the cable to line up properly

R33

post-67928-1262217667_thumb.jpg

A32

post-67928-1262217925_thumb.jpg

The plug location is different as are some of the lines, but we'll see what happens once I get the plenum. The TB should arrive from Japan in a couple of weeks - i'm buying a few parts at once but most of the shops shut down over the end of year break and don't open until next week at the earliest.

Edited by a31rb25

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...