Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I drive a 910 bluebird with a standard solid axle rear end in it but use s13 coilovers and strut braces etc. It handles well but could be better. A common mod is converting to a R30 independant rear end. Im keen to do this but i heard the camber is fixed.

Is there any way to give the rear end some camber? a few degrees negative.

Thanks,

G

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302532-camber-on-r30-rear-end/
Share on other sites

Hi,

I drive a 910 bluebird with a standard solid axle rear end in it but use s13 coilovers and strut braces etc. It handles well but could be better. A common mod is converting to a R30 independant rear end. Im keen to do this but i heard the camber is fixed.

Is there any way to give the rear end some camber? a few degrees negative.

Thanks,

G

Your right, just looked at my R30 skyline. There is the arm from the body to wheel hub and it solid, as in no adjustment what so ever. So you'll have to put up with 0negative camber. Unless you could find someone silly enough to cut the arm and weld it back on an angle. Here is a pic i took a few years ago when i forst got my R30..DSC05228.jpg

Your right, just looked at my R30 skyline. There is the arm from the body to wheel hub and it solid, as in no adjustment what so ever. So you'll have to put up with 0negative camber. Unless you could find someone silly enough to cut the arm and weld it back on an angle. Here is a pic i took a few years ago when i forst got my R30..DSC05228.jpg

What if, however, you made up an extention plate from where the A arm bolts on?

There must be some way to make something to allow for a camber adjustment.

(Thanks for the pic mate!)

G

Might I suggest that you don't need to have any static -ve camber. Unlike the solid rear axle, where the camber is fixed, the swinging A-arm has dynamic camber. As you load up the suspension and compress the spring, the suspension goes into -ve camber.

So one way to get some added -ve camber would be to lower the suspension. The only problem then is that the suspension goes toe-out.

What if, however, you made up an extention plate from where the A arm bolts on?

There must be some way to make something to allow for a camber adjustment.

(Thanks for the pic mate!)

G

essentially the same semi-trailing arm setup as Datsun 1600s - they have been doing that since the 70s. Check out Datsport to see what they do with their crossmembers, or you can slot the standard mounts for a little adjustment. You'll find plenty of stuff out there if you google...

1600s used to do it to reduce -ve camber on a lowered car and get the toe back to reasonble levels. R30 geometry is alot better if not excessively lowered, but who knows where it will all sit when its in a Bluebird... but yes, you can make them adjustable

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...