Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

DOTARS are/were not accepting import approvals till before Jan 01, so its risky business if Jspec are bringing in 15 unapproved cars.

i agree. applications can only be submitted on or after 1st jan. DOTRS then take the mandatory 3 weeks to return the very simple application. As it is on a case by case basis, you also have to prove the car was fully paid for by the cutoff date as well. Only after you have the import aproval should you put it on a boat.

they've got some contacts inside :P and last I heard they had the whole 10 cars sorted out. Its not a great deal of em, some of em are 1988 just arriving on the same ship. Come to think of it, most of em are RX7's n this pimped out Roll Royce

DOTARS are/were not accepting import approvals till before Jan 01, so its risky business if Jspec are bringing in 15 unapproved cars.

This is the reason why my car won't be laving Japan till mid January(estimate) and might actually be later. I am getting so impatient now...waiting....waiting

they've got some contacts inside :P and last I heard they had the whole 10 cars sorted out. Its not a great deal of em, some of em are 1988 just arriving on the same ship. Come to think of it, most of em are RX7's n this pimped out Roll Royce

what a load of crap !!!! contacts inside...j - spec have nothing of the sort...they will wait in the line like the rest of us I doubt if any 89 models will have import approvals before end of jan/early feb and cars should not be shipped till then or face the prospect of having them re-exported ...a freind of mine had 3 cars re exported because import approvals had not been issued before they arrived ...approvals arrived 3 days after cars did and they still made them send cars on round trip back to jp >bris

just a note my dealings with j-spec i found VERY difficult...you can get many answers for the same ? from these guys

they've got some contacts inside :P
that was sarcasm u tool... read what the rest of the post says before shooting your top off... 1988... but I know for a fact that they're looking at getting about 10-15 cars in under the exemption. Dunno when tho.

jake so you've imported thru j-spec then?

you'd be surprised... only a select few cars got in under the overlap period (where u can bring it into the country in jan) thanks to most people's hesitance to commit and confidence in the system. Whoever buys a 15 yr old car after Oct 8 2003 or thereabouts has to wait till the car reaches 15 yrs to the closest month. And in that time legislation can be passed to change the laws further. However then the same overlap will occur where if they show proof of purchase they'll be allowed entry under the old scheme (current scheme).

R32's came into production late in the year and finding a first run R32 is pretty hard... so don't expect more like yours to be in the country till at least Sept-Oct.

so these are 1988 models your talking about ?.. tosser

DOTARS are/were not accepting import approvals till before Jan 01, so its risky business if Jspec are bringing in 15 unapproved cars.

Maybe I worded that wrong... it should of read "applying for exemption" which is what I meant by "bringing in".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...