Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Just was wondering if anybody knew if a OS Giken Triple Plate and flywheel suited for a R32 GTR would work/suit my RB25DET gearbox? I've got an opportunity to get one but I'm just unsure if it will fit.

Cheers

Edited by muchogarcia34
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309525-will-this-clutch-fitwork/
Share on other sites

A Triple sound good but I think over kill for you. Bragging rights only and you may not like it in traffic conditions.

Cool, just wondering why it would be overkill. I'm not too knowlegable with clutches so if you wouldn't mind elaborating that would be great. The car will be making around 280 - 300rwkws.

I have an Exedy Triple plate in my car, they are a pain in the butt in traffic if your an every day driver, you may stall your car a lot unless you can master its uses, they have a lot of grip and in a panic situation this could mean a car up you Ass , unless your running well over 400rwkw it would be a waste of time, a simple after market organic clutch would be my choice, IMO. I've got a Nismo Copper mix in my hot little hands and can't wait to install it.

Ziller hit the nail on the head, unless you need a triple plate, no matter the price, it's just not worth the reduced driveabiltiy. However to answer your question it will physically fit your gearbox/engine however you will require a pull to push conversion kit. I personally would stick with the pull set-up, they are nicer to drive especially in a multi-plate clutch. However if you decide on the OS kit we keep genuine Nissan conversion kits on shelf so feel free to drop me a line.

If you have any questions, or desire an Exedy clutch kit drop me a line.

Andrew

seeing as your info saying you have an R34, id say you have a pull type, but best check... i have seen some cars with older model gearboxes in them.. so checking what is actually in yours is advisable before you buy anything.

an OS giken twin plate was useless enough for a regularly driven car.. little to no friction point, i can only see a triple being worse.. but have never driven a triple and from twin plate experience, the exedy hyper twins are just as bad. infact the hyper single is too.

as been stated already, buy a heavy duty for your car.. if you buy direct from a clutch specialist they can order you anything you want from exedy.. if your running abit of power, see if they can order you a HHDB :cheers: normally cost an extra hundred to uprate it one further. once installed a HHHDB to an S13, despite being enormous, it was still lightyears more streetable than a twin.. that was with a 1200kg clamp load and a 5 puck button.

GL

Ziller hit the nail on the head, unless you need a triple plate, no matter the price, it's just not worth the reduced driveabiltiy. However to answer your question it will physically fit your gearbox/engine however you will require a pull to push conversion kit. I personally would stick with the pull set-up, they are nicer to drive especially in a multi-plate clutch. However if you decide on the OS kit we keep genuine Nissan conversion kits on shelf so feel free to drop me a line.

If you have any questions, or desire an Exedy clutch kit drop me a line.

Andrew

Hi Andrew, Pre February 1993 have a push type, post February 1993 have a pull type clutch. I was caught out, I have a 95 vspec GTR that had previously had a twin plate that was R32 spec (push type) so some funny business happened in the past! Yes its always good to make sure. Push type has the slave cylinder pushing out towards the rear of the car while the pull type has the slave cylinder pushing towards the front of the car. Cheers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...