Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys my skyline is still for sale i really need it gone as im going overseas in 2 months

its a ECR33 GTST 1994

paint = ok

interior = good

engine = excelent

recent work including upgraded turbo Garrett T3076 R Apex PowerFC with Apex PowerFC boost controller 225rwkw

at 12 Psi boost have dyno sheet if needed all work done by Autotech in hume

im asking 10,000 ONO i really need this gone guys id love for this car to stay in canberra si i can see my much loved joy driving around

my number is 0402 708 957 Please no time wasters only people that are interested i really need this gone

Thanks guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/311400-quick-sale-needed/
Share on other sites

Have taken this car for a quick spin while I was looking for a replacement for my first skyline, do rate. Nice tone, easy to drive, and definitely has balls. Can't comment too much as it was only down the road and back, but definitely won't disappoint! Bloody good price too, such a shame! Good luck mate.

Have taken this car for a quick spin while I was looking for a replacement for my first skyline, do rate. Nice tone, easy to drive, and definitely has balls. Can't comment too much as it was only down the road and back, but definitely won't disappoint! Bloody good price too, such a shame! Good luck mate.

Cheers for the kind words mate and is such a shame i will def cry when i see this baby go

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

BUMP i really need this gone please guys i dont want this still here when i leave as i hate doing logistics at long distance

if you know anyone that wants a fantastic car that is quick, reliable with all the work done for really cheap please let them know and call me on 0402 708 957

thanks

Ross

^^^ unfortunately no sorry mate that's the prob its tuned with the Power FC for all the power and upgrades iv done then

BUMP!!!!!!!!!! please i need this gone guys !!

Edited by rossco_01

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...