Jump to content
SAU Community

R34 Rich Fuel Mixture - Apexi Afc


Recommended Posts

Hi all, need a bit of guidance. Had my newly acquired r34 gtt auto dyno'd and made 145kw at the wheels - is this a bit low for a NEO engine?

Health check revealed nothing bad accept for the fuel mixture was rich, the dyno mechanic explained that the mixture should be around 10 to 11 throughout the run but by car pretty much shot to 14 as soon as boos came on not sure what this means apart from that its thirsty. Also psi peaked early at 9psi but dropped off to 7 for atleast 1/2 the curve due to rich mixture. Not as smooth a power curve as I hoped for form a stock setup.

He then suggested to get an apexi afc.. I think its now called a superafc.

Question is what is the best product out there as far as tuning air/fuel maps for a skyline r34.. and if I do decide to get serious would I be better of getting an entire engine management unit such as power FC.

I have a fair idea of the concepts and theories behind afc & tuning but not familiar with what products are best matched for skylines & in particular the neo rb25

I'm serious about a full ecu, price is not really an issue but I've heard bad stories about lack of experience out there to tune neo's and high knock counts as a result of going custom.

Plus I've seen youtube videos of a 10,000 rpm skyline is this really possible - I would like to one day pursue an engine build that has ability to hit 8 to 9 k rpm, for simplicities sake what would it take to make a rock solid 8000 rpm rb25, is this foolish? .. would it be better to go high torque low rpm

What thoughts are there around having a large high lag turbo plus a supercharger to make up for the lag down low , has anyone tried this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the air fuel ratio should be about 10 to 11 for a stock car, and if it has been tuned it should be about 12. 14 isn't richer than 10 or 11, it is leaner. the lower the number the more fuel there is as it is the AIR/FUEL ratio, so when saying 10 or 11 or 14 that is 10 parts air to 1 part fuel. that is unless he is somehow reading the AFRs differently.

for the AFR to be going so lean when boost comes on then you may have a fuel pump issue or a fuel pressure regulator issue. my suggestion would be to forget the SAFC and get yourself a nistune (pretty sure they do them for the r34) and get that tuned. that will cost you less than a PFC, give you the same results and be much better than the SAFC. should cost you under $1000 for the nistune and to get it tuned (similar cost to a SAFC but will give much better gains than a SAFC).

as for the power you made and the behaviour of the boost, that really comes down to what mods you have. if you are still running stock exhaust, or only have a cat back exhaust and still have the stock cat and turbo to cat section of the exhaust then i would say that the power you made is about right, all things considered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the air fuel ratio should be about 10 to 11 for a stock car, and if it has been tuned it should be about 12. 14 isn't richer than 10 or 11, it is leaner. the lower the number the more fuel there is as it is the AIR/FUEL ratio, so when saying 10 or 11 or 14 that is 10 parts air to 1 part fuel. that is unless he is somehow reading the AFRs differently.

for the AFR to be going so lean when boost comes on then you may have a fuel pump issue or a fuel pressure regulator issue. my suggestion would be to forget the SAFC and get yourself a nistune (pretty sure they do them for the r34) and get that tuned. that will cost you less than a PFC, give you the same results and be much better than the SAFC. should cost you under $1000 for the nistune and to get it tuned (similar cost to a SAFC but will give much better gains than a SAFC).

as for the power you made and the behaviour of the boost, that really comes down to what mods you have. if you are still running stock exhaust, or only have a cat back exhaust and still have the stock cat and turbo to cat section of the exhaust then i would say that the power you made is about right, all things considered.

is 14 too lean in this situation?

the actual data:

psi speed a/f lambda petrol

1.5 70 14.4 .99

1.5 80 14.4 .99

4.3 90 13.6 .93

6.2 100 11.9 .82

8.2 110 11.4 .78

8.3 120 10.9 .75

8.2 130 10.3 .70

8.0 140 10.2 .70

7.8 150 10.0 .69

7.6 160 10.0 .69

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no that looks pretty right. the reason being that at light throttle the AFR's will actually be between 14 and 15, controlled by the o2 sensor and the ecu. once you put your foot down the ecu ignores the o2 sensor and reverts to it's mapping and there is where it runs richer.

in the case of your car, it is running rather rich up top and it would greatly benefit from some form of aftermarket ecu, be it a nistune or a SAFC or any other ecu or piggyback. the ideal afr you want is about 12:1 where as you are running as rich as 10:1 (which is common for stock ecu cars).

as for the power it made, what mods do you have? that will be a determining factor as to how good/bad your power is, but considering the boost pressure you were running it doesn't sound too far off what it should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no that looks pretty right. the reason being that at light throttle the AFR's will actually be between 14 and 15, controlled by the o2 sensor and the ecu. once you put your foot down the ecu ignores the o2 sensor and reverts to it's mapping and there is where it runs richer.

in the case of your car, it is running rather rich up top and it would greatly benefit from some form of aftermarket ecu, be it a nistune or a SAFC or any other ecu or piggyback. the ideal afr you want is about 12:1 where as you are running as rich as 10:1 (which is common for stock ecu cars).

as for the power it made, what mods do you have? that will be a determining factor as to how good/bad your power is, but considering the boost pressure you were running it doesn't sound too far off what it should be.

No mods at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in that case then the power you made is pretty much right. you have to remember that the 206kw they are rated at is at the flywheel and not at the wheels, so the power at the wheels will always be less.

throw on a full exhaust, wind the boost up to about 10psi and you should see that figure rise up to around 170 to 185kw. throw on a frount mount intercooler and raise the boost up to around 12psi and you should see about 190 to 200kw. add a tune on top of that and you should see a bit more again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Chatting one someone recently at racing them at QR. They say you can't take turn 2 in one flat stick in 4th. They don't have the torque to pull them selves straight, so make sure you're ringing it's neck out in 3rd instead
    • Many years ago when I bought my FG XR6T, it came with bald tyres on the back (think pretty much smooth for most of the tread) and brand new Kinforest cheap shit tyres on the front. In the rain, I had more grip in the bald ass tyres on the back, than the brand new Kinforest. To the point you couldn't drive off at a set of lights and turn the corner. Car would only go straight. Very quickly all four tyres were replaced.   A few years back on a VF SV6 I had, it came with brand new chineesium tyres. In the wet at 90kmh, old 1990s tray back tradie utes could corner faster than me. There was one corner on a freeway, in a 90 zone, it's not even marked to reduce speed for those curve, it's not a hard corner, I could put the LandCruiser on mud tyres through with ease (it would easily do the corner in the wet I reckon at 120kmh), the VF however couldn't get through it at 80, as it would want to slide out.   Cheap tyres aren't worth the risk. I like decent brakes, and decent grip.
    • It shouldn't swell like that, (just looked it up) it should say SAE J30R10  
    • Anyone here a submersible fuel hose expert? I pulled my hanger out again for unrelated issues and noticed the hose I popped on last week has already swollen. This is Gates 27093 submersible hose. I've waiting on a response from Gates, but this surely can't be normal? This is on pump gas, not E85.  Is swelling a tad possibly normal? I've also been fighting with my power steering belt.... I've now tossed one and killed two. I just realigned my pulleys again, hoping this time it stays on. It doesn't like high rpm.   
    • Don't want to side track from the thread too much (don't want to upset the thread starter's run from 2007) so here's some old rusted Nissan Laurels in a parking lot in Nishinomiya, Hyogo-ken:
×
×
  • Create New...