Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I had a reply from these guys and looks the best of the bunch , Nice find any :blush: ill place my order and let you know how it goes , like the idea of no cables showing and using the ash tray.

" The interface we use for the Infiniti G35s is capable of interfacing with sat radios(what most people sell) as well as non sat radios (like you have). You would access the iPod by pressing the "cd" or "disc" button. You will be able to keep your in dash cd functionality as well. We haven't been able to test with your type car directly as it's not available in the states but it looks just like the early G35s we have worked on. As with all our products if you aren't satisfied with it then it can be returned in like new condition within 30 days for a full refund less shipping costs."

Yes I can see this one as being the best for the iPhone users who need to take the phone in and out all the time..

For me, I wanted it all hidden, so the iPod, cable from the PA11 and the Tunecenter are all under the centre console and can all be controlled either from the audio or from a little remote control. My only other concern, is that with the Spec.Docks, and I did look at them as well, there is a chance that the iDevice will throw itself across the car during violent manouvers, like tight roundabouts, or rough roads. My iPod has fallen out of the my Tune Centre the once, when I was following my father in law down what they call an "unsurfaced road". Its the one that feels like it has been surfaced with corrigated roofing sheets... Plugged it into the PA11, no such problems...

Whichever way you go, you will love the integration of the device into the audio.. For me, and some of the others, it was our only choice, as our 6 discs were broken, but glad I did this anyway..

My only other concern, is that with the Spec.Docks, and I did look at them as well, there is a chance that the iDevice will throw itself across the car during violent manouvers, like tight roundabouts, or rough roads. My iPod has fallen out of the my Tune Centre the once, when I was following my father in law down what they call an "unsurfaced road". Its the one that feels like it has been surfaced with corrigated roofing sheets... Plugged it into the PA11, no such problems...

Whichever way you go, you will love the integration of the device into the audio.. For me, and some of the others, it was our only choice, as our 6 discs were broken, but glad I did this anyway..

Dident think of that issue , maybe right . I know the iPods dont fit in the apple dock bases with covers on either , i have a rubber cover on my classic and it wont fit in my Yamaha HT dock with its protective cover on :blush:

We have the metal roads here too and try to avoid the best i can .. thats dust gets places you will be seeing for months !!

Ill give it a go anyways and let you know how it goes ..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...