Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

All,

Dave from moto concepts has asked for my to try and organise another skid pan Day on Sat 27th March. After the 20 + no shows at the last day the following format will be tried.

Both pans again, the large skid pan and the figure 8, we will have 2 instructors.

Early morning, one person on a pan at a time so you can get confidence in your car and the track. After this double shoot outs with chase time on the figure 8.

You will get heaps of pan time and do around a tank of juice. There will be little wear on your car as you dont get much over 80km/hr, and your tyres will skid most of the day do wear will be nothing over the day.

The cost

35 Cars on the day, $75 deposit needed for non members $50 for members

$150 per car 35 names max,

$50 per additional driver,

$10 per passenger (Wrist bands to be used to ensure on driving

I will need a $75 deposit for non members and $50 for members

Deposits are transferable to other drivers if you cant make it, the focus is on ensuring numbers not to take your money.

I will assume 5 drop outs on the day so 30 people for the day will be comfortable.

Any questions please let me know.

Thanks OZ

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31869-skid-pan-ec-sat-27th-march-04/
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Guys: just a reminder. There's an election on the 27th march and you have to vote IN YOUR ELECTORATE (there are no absent-t votes...). If you won't be in your electorate that day, ring your council and get a postal vote application sent out.

Just thought i'd better remind you when i saw the date.

Cheers,

Dave.

COUNCIL elections mate... tht's just the way they are... it's basically to save A LOT of time for eletoral emplyees... saves a lot of excess work, excess counting and excess preperation...

I work for the electoral office and i can tell you, you have no idea how much extra work there'd be if it where any other way....



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...