Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Was it as responsive at stockie? NO.

i've been in it stock. and hell yeah its responsive :blink:

BACK ON TOPIC.

car look's nice and neat, but with a big red pod hanging out next to some Chrome piping, you'll get raped, not to mention braided lines. just stating the obvious :P

looks awesome though, and with that power figure will be awesome to to drive, what have you got planned for when you loose your license in 7months haha

lmaooo nicee i wish i had my car when i lost my license

i lost my license for 1 Yr and 3 months, its not like i stoped driving lmao they didnt catch me

Smart....

dam i dont think i could go over a year without my licence 6 months was enough . but if i do ever loose it again i will most likley put a 2.5 lt engine in the 32 . one of my mates did it with a bigger turbo and external gate set up , it was simply amazing. the power and the noise was awesome . even if i dont have to be forced off the rds i will eventually do it , just time and money i guess.

thanx for the feedback , ill bring the car to some SAU meets soon . my old man will be driving it to Vic Imports Club meet on the sun 16th may for me, then i get my licence back the following sunday .

CANT WAIT !

very nice.

Is the HKS GTRS direct bolt-on to the dump? When does full boost come in?

Also where you get those steel hoses for the catchcan

imo the airpod isnt in the best place. One bad downpour and its gonna be soaked.

i get full boost (18psi) at 4000rpm or maybe just below that in the gts4. GT-RS is the best turbo for the RB20, get one Pat you know you want one! :3some:

that said, i'm pretty happy with the HKS2510 on the gtst :) response almost like stock.....

Douche, that's what im trying to tell you, the obvious..

well obviously i already know that the standard turbo in more responsive

however what i was saying was Matt's car isnt that laggy, cosidering that amount of work done, hench why its off-tap

well obviously i already know that the standard turbo in more responsive

however what i was saying was Matt's car isnt that laggy, cosidering that amount of work done, hench why its off-tap

Well if you go back to my initial post and you will realise that i compared the gt35 to standard turbo...Thats all i was saying...I probably only said it 'cos i hate laggy tubos, probably because i had one.... 4000rpm full boost... Normal driving, going up the westgate bridge, you need to down gear, turbo wouldnt boost at all under 3k. But that all depends on set up your running of course.

Was it as responsive at stockie? NO.

Actually... you never went in my car so you wouldn't know. It had a shitload of response down low, it was just as responsive as a stock turbo but with more power everywhere. More flow, more boost, less exhaust restriction + good tuning. My point is, GT35's are not laggy if you run the right setup with a built engine and all the goodies. If you are comparing a stock turbo on a stock engine to a GT35 turbo on a stock engine, then you're just stating the obvious.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...