Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im chasing data for the old VL turbo 070 fuel pump to find out what it can flow at 70-75 PSI. As I understand it, most of these bosh pumps really take a flow dive after about 68-70psi but I need actual flow data.

The picture below is the sort of thing I am after. Flow vs PSI. Still searching but no 070/vl data yet other than...

0 580 464 070........... 130............ (3 Bar) (43psi)

flowtests-walbro2.gif

Cheers,

Ian

Edited by GTRNUR
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320862-fuel-pump-flow-data-lph-vs-psi/
Share on other sites

Its not for any particular project that I need the data.

I am investigating someone's engine blow up, and have found out their base pressure was peaking around 75psi. At this pressure, the flow rates potentially drop off significantly. If I know what the pump flow rates were I can calculate the flow at the injector and work out if the problem was actually the pump or if it was something else.

OK well you have probably found the same web pages as this one:

http://www.lucasinjection.com/bosch_and_lucas_fuel_pumps.htm

which shows four flow charts for Bosch pumps and in each case the pressure drops off sharply after the rated pressure so the 070 pump rated 130L/hr at 3 bar would pretty much not be flowing anything much by 5 bar.

I am investigating someone's engine blow up, and have found out their base pressure was peaking around 75psi.

I dont think you mean 75psi of base fuel pressure, because if you were running 15psi of boost, your fuel pressure would be 90psi!

Do you mean 75psi of total fuel pressure?

This can be a major issue with increasing the fuel pressure to get more out of a size of injectors.

The engine in question was naturally aspirated and the base pressure with the regulator vacuum hose was set to 60psi at idle. With the hose disconected/WOT the pressure went to ~72-75psi.

The engine was only running 4 x 300cc injectors which was adequite for the engines power requirements, but if the pressure was too high (into the area that flow takes a dive), pump flow might have not been enough to keep fuel up to the engine. The engine in queston had the piston detach from the rod. Then the rod went about making holes in the case, breaking the camshaft and then everything else was damaged or destroyed due to valve train interference and loss of oil pressure. It all goes bad very quickly above 7000 rpm.

The engine in question was naturally aspirated and the base pressure with the regulator vacuum hose was set to 60psi at idle. With the hose disconected/WOT the pressure went to ~72-75psi.

The engine was only running 4 x 300cc injectors which was adequite for the engines power requirements, but if the pressure was too high (into the area that flow takes a dive), pump flow might have not been enough to keep fuel up to the engine. The engine in queston had the piston detach from the rod. Then the rod went about making holes in the case, breaking the camshaft and then everything else was damaged or destroyed due to valve train interference and loss of oil pressure. It all goes bad very quickly above 7000 rpm.

Apologies, I thought being in the forced induction section it wouldnt be N/A :)

Yeah I see your logic, it is a possible cause.

If the rod broke the cam, im hoping it wasnt your VW motor. Its an interesting idea though, raising the pressure to get more fuel through the injectors, which kills the pump flow to the point it cant feed the injectors. However remember if the pump couldnt keep up, the rail pressure goes down and the flow goes up. :)

Sorry for the confusion posting in forced induction... I figured it would be the right place because it was using a "VL turbo" pump.

Yes it was a VW engine but not mine.

The thing with the tune of the engine was that it wasnt even close to running near max duty cycle, so there was no need to run the fuel pressure high. It would have been better for everything (fuel temps, electrical system current drain etc) if it had been 43psi. Whats left of the engine now really is just carnage. There isnt much left to try and diagnose the cause of the failure. $10k worth of engine destroyed.

If the rod broke the cam, im hoping it wasnt your VW motor. Its an interesting idea though, raising the pressure to get more fuel through the injectors, which kills the pump flow to the point it cant feed the injectors. However remember if the pump couldnt keep up, the rail pressure goes down and the flow goes up. :)

Then as soon as the flow goes up the pressure would increase.... going around in circles. It would reach an equilibrium somewhere below the required pressure.

The increased pressure may have overloaded the pump causing internal damage, which would then result in lower flow rates.

Set the pump up on a bench with an adjustable FPR set at the pumps rated pressure and check the flow rate. If it's below the quoted flow rate then that proves the pump was failing.

If the pump is within spec at it's rated pressure, bump the FPR up to 72psi (or whatever the setup was on the failed engine). Measure the flow rate again and do the calcs.

from my days at mercedes on the old cis and cis-e injection, the test pressure was around 85psi base pressure. these were all bosch roller cell pumps. some single some ran 2 smaller vlturbo sized pumps in series.

i would of thought that the bosch pumps were designed to run these sorts of pressures

looks like my 044's will work with my 5 bar reg. :D with 2 bar boost

Hope you have good injectors as most are only rated up to 8bar. Also most new ev6-14 injectors specify 4bar operating pressure.

As for investigating the failure I would be checking the flow rate of the pump you used on the vehicle. How pumps work in operation compare to actal flow data can be quite different.

looks like my 044's will work with my 5 bar reg. :D with 2 bar boost

I dont see why high fuel pressures is getting you excited. The general principle I thought was to run as close to 3-4 bar of base fuel pressure to keep things reliable and keep fuel temps down. I thought really high fuel pressures (5bar+) were just for people that couldnt afford the proper sized injectors.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
×
×
  • Create New...