Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So I got my tint redone yesterday...20% all round ( not windscreen of course )

Am I the only one who didnt know I just voided my insurance? Found out from a neighbour who saw the car.

Ive always thought darker than legal tint could get me a fine ( was willing to risk it ) but Ive never heard anyone talk about it voiding insurance, therefore never even thought to ask anyone to "define legal tint"

If this is the case there alot ALOT of uninsured cars driving around!!

Prolly have to rip it off now do it 35% pffffffft !!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/321059-window-tint-and-insurance/
Share on other sites

LOL anything that isnt road legal will "void your insurance"

however there are reasons why they would/wouldnt pay you out.. but i'm not in that area and am not willing to say anything due to it not being my area of expertise..

So I got my tint redone yesterday...20% all round ( not windscreen of course )

Am I the only one who didnt know I just voided my insurance? Found out from a neighbour who saw the car.

Ive always thought darker than legal tint could get me a fine ( was willing to risk it ) but Ive never heard anyone talk about it voiding insurance, therefore never even thought to ask anyone to "define legal tint"

If this is the case there alot ALOT of uninsured cars driving around!!

Prolly have to rip it off now do it 35% pffffffft !!

Yup. Insurance companies will try anything to get out of paying you if you need them too. Because it is darker than legal then your car is "unroadworthy" hence illegal so even if somebody stole your car and it was recovered the insurance company wont pay out. There are a lot of cars that fit in that bill and run the risk. I personally would rather it stay legal and forgo a little of the "look" factor.

You can get some tint that looks darker than legal but when tested comes up fine.

Edited by Kiwibob

Firstly, anything defectable 'could' be used to void your policy.

35% transmittance is the legal tint.

If you were at fault then hells yeah they would decline your ass. If you were not at fault they may let it slide but warn you about it, i know its how I roll.

If you don't change it please don't cry when you hit a car you couldn't see and have your claim declined =P

  • 1 month later...

Depends on the state - each state has different tinting laws. In South Australia you can't have more than 35% on any of the windows (and even that's relatively recent - it used to be 35% behind driver, only 70% for fronts - yuck).

Check with your relevant Roads/Transport authority website - they should have pretty clear rules about it.

And yes, as already stated - anything that's 'defectable' could void your insurance in a claim - given tint is a visibility thing, could easily by pointed at for particular accidents, and your insurance rendered void. Either way, you want to stay legal to avoid police attention and fines, right?

i got my old r34 GTT windows tinted to match the back and rear side windows the little ones (which i was told was not just tint but privacy glass or something..) i had them try to match the tint to the same colour which was apparently darker than legal.. didnt void my insurance but mayb i was just lucky...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...