Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

aahhh, don't ask dude.

we were having disputes with the trubo supplier and when we came to an agreement, the dude from garrett said that he'll send down a A/R .82 which should be fine, but they actually sent down the A/R .63, and before i knew it, it was already on the car.

i think it should be ok though as the same combo with a A/R .63 made ~260rwkw on an RB30ET at ~20psi.

if i'm not happy, i'll be sending it back to sydney and asking for a .82.

i think it should be ok though as the same combo with a A/R .63 made ~260rwkw on an RB30ET at ~20psi.

That was a little bit of interesting information. Interesting being the amount of extra boost required for the SOHC head on the 3ltr to make 260rwkw.

you're cool dude.

i actually found out from my friend yesterday that the car i mentioned actually ran 18-19psi when it made that power.

also, another car with that same turbo made 285rwkw on 24psi.

i guess the SOHC makes quite a difference to power as compared to DOHC.

actually, my 2L cossie engine (DOHC) made almost the same power a VL RB30ET (SOHC) would make with the same turbo on the same boost, so i'm happy.

btw, the VL i mentioned which made ~260rwkw with the GT3040 (A/R .63) has run an 11.67@115mph at calder park, and fyi, it's a 5 spd manual.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...