Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well IMO paying someone to check out the car would be the very last thing that you'd do when you purchase a car. Wouldn't want to pay $300 for someone to check the car when you haven't even seen the car yourself.

So I reckon the first time inspection, take someone that knows about skylines with you, and check everything thoroughly yourself, if it passes your expectation, then pay the $300 to get it checked properly before buying it :)

Yeah agreed agreed, only problem is the only mate I know that own's a Skyline only knows the very basics. Guess we'll see.

A car is a car, the majority of problems you'll encounter will be universal to all cars and not Skyline specific.

Do some research on what to look for in any car, I know there's a good checklist online somewhere that covers almost everything you can inspect without professional equipment. From engine noises, gearbox feel, spotting over spray, new parts and even checks to see if the clock has been wound back (just things like excessive steering wheel wear, etc).

Yeah agreed agreed, only problem is the only mate I know that own's a Skyline only knows the very basics. Guess we'll see.

Well maybe bring someone that knows about CARS, just to check for common problems, like KezR33 said, engine noise, rust and all that.

Definitely need to take it for a test drive, to see if there's any unusual noise, verbrating or steering problems etc. When you do take it for a test drive, don't drive it like a granny lol, do some quick accerations or some emergancy braking or some other manuvers to test out the cars abilities.

Also, there's no harm in going back there the 2nd time, but bringing someone else to check over it.

And I guess once you are happy with what you see and how it drives, then pay someone the money to get it check fully.

Well maybe bring someone that knows about CARS, just to check for common problems, like KezR33 said, engine noise, rust and all that.

Definitely need to take it for a test drive, to see if there's any unusual noise, verbrating or steering problems etc. When you do take it for a test drive, don't drive it like a granny lol, do some quick accerations or some emergancy braking or some other manuvers to test out the cars abilities.

Also, there's no harm in going back there the 2nd time, but bringing someone else to check over it.

And I guess once you are happy with what you see and how it drives, then pay someone the money to get it check fully.

Just be aware that some sellers do not allow a test drive until a deposit is paid.

From my experience in selling a lot of my Jap cars now, you get a lot of peasants rock up that just want to take the car for a squirt.

I always say no and the look on their face changes immediately if they are time wasters.

Oh AND if you are coming a 2nd time, better bring a deposit, or don't come at all. lol. As you can see, I am not a fan of time-wasters.

It's funny how different people are when it comes to selling their car.

I've always let people drive my car (with me in it, and none of their mates), but then again I've never sold a car that would really appeal to a joy rider.

Majority of the Supras I looked at though the owners just handed my mate and I the keys and said have fun. Very brave considering some of the drivers out there.

It's funny how different people are when it comes to selling their car.

I've always let people drive my car (with me in it, and none of their mates), but then again I've never sold a car that would really appeal to a joy rider.

Majority of the Supras I looked at though the owners just handed my mate and I the keys and said have fun. Very brave considering some of the drivers out there.

Lets hope so, less problems the better. This car's a non turbo and coming up to 180 thou kays, I wonder what I'm gonna find :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...