Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.police.wa.gov.au/ABOUTUS/News/S...70/Default.aspx

from a leach hwy runner point of view, almost get caught by a radar gun today, someone thought it will be safe if the route not on that list, the fact is, NOT

any bro know is that the radar gun man are totally unpredictable? they just set it at a random place?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/323949-speed-camera-location-is-useful/
Share on other sites

Ok i had to read that a couple of times to decipher it... But after figuring out what i think you are trying to say, you will find that officers on patrol can setup wherever they feel it is likely they will catch speeders, so it is entirely random.

If u click that link at the top and download the "Speed camera locations to 13 June 2010", maybe u will understand what i ve said....

just want to say i totally forgot there is a radar gun man exist and almost get caught by the radar gun on leach hwy :thumbsup: and remind someone who are using that list as reference...

Speed Camera locations are required to be published, as a notice, because they can't technically take your photo without your permission or notifying you that your picture MAY be taken in a certain area / time. Likewise, red light camera's are sign posted. Speed camera's are MEANT to have a sign before, saying "are you speeding?" (then camera, then sign "anywhere, anytime")

Because handheld radars do not take pictures, they can be set up, anywhere, anytime...without notice or publication.

They're totally random and unpredictable.

The End.

Speed Camera locations are required to be published, as a notice, because they can't technically take your photo without your permission or notifying you that your picture MAY be taken in a certain area / time. Likewise, red light camera's are sign posted. Speed camera's are MEANT to have a sign before, saying "are you speeding?" (then camera, then sign "anywhere, anytime")

Because handheld radars do not take pictures, they can be set up, anywhere, anytime...without notice or publication.

They're totally random and unpredictable.

The End.

thanks nic

'handheld radars do not take pictures', so what kind of evidence they use to charge you? or there are a video recorder associate with the radar?

If u run pass a radar at 110mph how can the officer chase you down? or they just let you go (what the..)

have zero knowledge on the radars sorry for asking too much

ya ignore that plx, i dunno why i wrote in that way......sorry for hurting your brain

It's more the fact that you though you were only able to get caught on those roads listed.

Cops are everywhere, if you think you can wake up in the morning and check that list, and decide you are safe to speed on every road but the ones they say there will be a radar on... you're an idiot.

If u click that link at the top and download the "Speed camera locations to 13 June 2010", maybe u will understand what i ve said....

just want to say i totally forgot there is a radar gun man exist and almost get caught by the radar gun on leach hwy :D and remind someone who are using that list as reference...

Let's re-write that so people understand.

If you click on that link and download the "Speed Camera Locations to 13 June 2010" you will understand what I have just said....

I just wanted to say I totally forgot there was police with a radar guns and I almost got caught by one on leach hwy, just a reminder for anyone who is using that list...

now was that so hard to write so people could understand? either people are getting dumber and dumber these days that they can't even put a sentence together.

Edited by SexycanI

Cops don't even need to show you a reading on their handheld to issue a fine, and they can issue fines withouth a photo, with their partner present who acts as a witness.

Even without their partner (off duty), cops can still issue arrests and shit.

Let's re-write that so people understand.

If you click on that link and download the "Speed Camera Locations to 13 June 2010" you will understand what I have just said....

I just wanted to say I totally forgot there was police with a radar guns and I almost got caught by one on leach hwy, just a reminder for anyone who is using that list...

now was that so hard to write so people could understand? either people are getting dumber and dumber these days that they can't even put a sentence together.

Lol that is still fail English? :D

Hand-helds are lasers..

In-car are radars.. (similar to multinova but a different band)

The cops don't have to show you the reading on the hand-held but if it's spectacular enough they will.. e.g. when I got done as a P-plater for 115 in a 60, he made me get out and look at the reading.. 115kmh 315m away :D

Lol that is still fail English? :domokun:

comparing it to his sentence? which one is more understandable?

most threads lately are full of sentences you can't even understand, go back a page and look at CaM!'s thread about Good Cops.

most of the time they show you the readout as it instantly elimates any doubt that you were speeding. they go through plenty of people and probably get lots arguing, so its just easier that way.

at the end of the day, if you want to go out for a thrash, know where you can do it with very little chance of getting caught. dont go winding out 3rd on the freeway in the middle of the day.

comparing it to his sentence? which one is more understandable?

most threads lately are full of sentences you can't even understand, go back a page and look at CaM!'s thread about Good Cops.

come on, we are not having an English exam here do we? take it easy, it is our spare time on the internet who having a little chat

I do apologize for what i wrote at the beginning ;)

most of the time they show you the readout as it instantly elimates any doubt that you were speeding. they go through plenty of people and probably get lots arguing, so its just easier that way.

at the end of the day, if you want to go out for a thrash, know where you can do it with very little chance of getting caught. dont go winding out 3rd on the freeway in the middle of the day.

VERY TRUE

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...