Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As far as I know it's fine becuase your trying to keep the overall circumfrence the same but the rear is wider so it has to have a smaller sidewall.

Click here for a tyre calculator to help you see what happens when you put the same profile on both front and rears. Just type in your front and rear tyre sizes and see the difference.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/32408-tyre-question/#findComment-650566
Share on other sites

yes it is fine, because the 40 or 45 rating is just an indication of a ratio of the height of the tyre wall compared to the width of the tyre. So obviously if 235:45 and 255:40 mean that the tyre heights will be similar. if both the tyres were the same then the ratio would mean that one tyre had a definetly higher side wall.

i have the same tyre sizes as you btw, and they are fine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/32408-tyre-question/#findComment-650775
Share on other sites

Click here for a tyre calculator to help you see what happens when you put the same profile on both front and rears. Just type in your front and rear tyre sizes and see the difference.
Thats an excellent site, thanks.
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/32408-tyre-question/#findComment-650790
Share on other sites

i have the same setup, 245/45/17 on the front and 255/40/17 on the back and have no worries. Just dont do what i did and get ripped off for a pair of bridgy S03's 255/40/17 ($450 ea.) I thought he quoted me the price on the pair - not each. :bonk:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/32408-tyre-question/#findComment-654032
Share on other sites

s03s are a good tyre though.. good tyres = pricey. especially huge sizes like 255s.

i just got a set of pirelli p6000s,, 255/40/zr17 for $90 each.

catch= second hand. one was at least 95% there.. the other was 30% gone on one side and 50% in the middle(done care about that part too much :D so yeah had to make sure the new edge of that one was on the inside.

but still. it would have cost me double 180 to get just one good new tyre. so even if i use them for half as long its good value :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/32408-tyre-question/#findComment-659599
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...