Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all, this is my first post here. I've finally ditched my turbo VL commodre and bought a 94 R33 GTS25t (auto).

I really want to do just one or two little mods on my car and was wondering where would be the best place to start. I was thinking about a full 3" Mandrel bent exhaust with dump pipe, hi flow cat etc. I have been quoted $1200 from an exhaust place, is this a good place to start?

And I also would like to know the difference between Stainless steel exhausts and regular bent steel ones?

Can anyone tell me the noise difference. Also should the car be dyno'd or re-tuned in any other way if I do this mod, because I don't want to have ruff idling etc. (Reliability is important to me)

thx in advance

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/32529-first-mod-for-a-gts25t/
Share on other sites

For $1200, you should be able to buy a brand-name exhaust such as an APEXi (N1) or a HKS stainless cat-back system (inc. fitting).

APEXi also makes a titanium cat-back system; its major benefit is reduced weight ($1400 inc. fitting). Coupled with a good quality high-flow cat (say, $300?), you should receive quite a substantial boost throughout the rev range, and you will find that the car performs better both on- and off-boost.

Also, look at getting a 'pod' filter; cheap ones (still good!) go for around $80 all up, and brand name ones can go from $200 and up (HKS, APEX'i, Blitz). A boost controller may also be a worthwhile investment ($200 for a Turbosmart), as you can increase the boost and therefore the performance of your car. An extra 3-4 psi will give good gains; anymore depends on the engine.

Note: The prices above are just rough estimates. Buying it all from the one shop (where possible) might net you a little discount.

To give you an idea I gained 18kw @ wheels from changing to a apexi n1 cat back system from the stock exhaust. With any car, turbo's particularly, the first thing to change is the thing that restricts the exhaust gas flow the most, namely the exhaust. Put a good system on and when you do things like increase the boost you will gain more HP than if you left the stock exhaust on.

Thx for the advice 'rob' and 'elithrar'. Its comforting when different people can agree on the same things :rolleyes:. So Apexi cat back with a hi-flow cat seems like the way to go.

So I'm assuming the 3"dump pipe makes very little difference then, or not as much as Hi-flow cat plus a good cat back system?

As far as the noise is concerned is it very loud? I mean street legal?

Cat back, highflow cat (better to get a decat pipe) but make sure it flows well, ie, its big. I have seen a couple of 3" 'highflow cats, that had the same size face as a stock one.

Front pipe, definately worth while. It will give you more off boost and quicker spool up, less lag - its all good.

The dump itself, also worth doing. Try and get a split wastegate type. Probably doesnt make alot of difference with being split vs integrated with the stock turbo, but if you ever want to upgrade, it will make alot of difference.

With the above mods, you will probably find boost has also increased to around 7/9psi vs the stock 5/7psi. If you get a bleed or boost controller, dont take boost past 10-11psi without doing the intercooler first.

I dont think investing in a pod filter is as good as/cheap as a good panel replacement (like a k&n replacement)
I too would most certainly agree with this.

No point removing your standard airbox (and filter element) to change to a Pod because the Pod is just going to sit in your engine bay and suck in hot dirty air. The standard airbox has a fantastic snorkel on it designed to suck in clean cold air from outside of your engine bay.

Simply remove the standard filter element and put in a K&N worth about $110. It will take you longer to pay for the filter at a shop than it will to change it and you get instant power.

A good thread to read over is:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...read.php?t=9292

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...