Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Try the bluebirds australia site. :D

OK sorry. Nice sleeper to annoy the wrx crew with some mods...and it's a nissan so doesn't have the idiotic boxer engine that sounds like a mower. Std handling is a bit doughy so give that a tweak and should be nice.

hey dude im telling ya now bluebirds are really good cars they handel well and have got the power ti beat a stock wrx also not much ppl know wat type of car it is so u can say its a sleeper insurance is pretty good (depending on your age and wat not)if u are looking at buying one i know a guy who is selling a great example for 15k pm me and give u his contact number and email

:cheers:

hey when i was looking for a new car i wanted a jap bluebird, but they cannot be imported under raws, whiteline do a suspension kit and you can do all the usual sr20 mods, apparently they have a pretty weak gearbox though. Pretty cool car, beat skylines without too much fuss. They have attesa but they are front wheel drive til traction lost then rears come in - not as much fun as rwd skyline.

So many misguided thoughts here, but I refuse to battle wits with those who are unarmed.

Fact: won't beat a stock man skyline as standard.

Fact: not as quick as the same years WRX but mostly due to handling.

Fact: very few with manual gearbox.

Fact: with SR20DET and the Attessa they are very responsive to mods.

Worth buying, then debadge :(

Well i own a nice one and i would put it up against a gts-t on a standing start no worries.The atessa is rear wheel drive until the front kicks in.ive had no dramas dumping it at 7000rpm spinning the rears for a split sec then fronts grab and sling shot outta there.does need the whiteline kit to really push it through corners as understeer is scary.Need any more info give us a yell

I looked at a couple at an import yard a while ago. Tried to convince my mate to get one cuz hes got kids and needs 4 doors. They are a great sleeper, really nice interior with all power options and you wouldnt get hassled at all. Just about all of them are auto though. Just bolt on your usual mods and youll suprise alot of people out there.

sorry r34gtt-r, i was led to believe they were front then back - but you should know seeing as you have one.

skyline geoff even though i own a skyline i would still back the stock bird against stock line - i remember seeing the standard 0-100 figures on an importer's web site and one of the reasons i wanted a bluebird was because it's quick, quicker than a skyline even :)

Naa keep spending all my money on the GTT.

Here is the best article on Bluebird ive found well worth the read!!!!!

http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_0140/article.html

"As a family-based car with stealth performance the 4WD turbo Bluebird is virtually unbeatable. It features a cavernous boot, an inoffensive interior design and NVH levels that are in keeping with any other mid-sized sedan. It is extremely safe with excellent stability, ABS brakes, an abundance of useful power, and it also returns good fuel consumption."

The auto version that we tested unfortunately had a badly slipping trans, but from seat-of-the-pants experience we'd suggest the car to normally be a mid-8 second 0-100km/h car. However, its performance times have been quoted as 7.4 seconds for the 0-100 and 15.4 seconds over the quarter. Without the fluid coupling, the manual versions cut these times to highly respectable 6.2 and 14.5 seconds respectively (remember that's on Japanese grade fuel).

Meanwhile the 33 is quoted at flat 6 and having imported these things for a while, I'll go along with that. So if you have no mechanical sympathy then do your 7 grand launches and lunch you clutch and box for 6.2's if you can actually get a manual. The numbers speak for themselves.

Back on topic though, I like them, but they won't really bother a skyline too much until it gets wet. Crap that WRX's are even a stockie will eat me in a straight line in the wet, and I get wheelspin at 180 in fourth in the wet.

Suit myself? I generally do. No drags for me unless it involves the rolling start from the corner entering the straight. I don't mind, any straight throughout the lap of the track will do.

I'm actually pretty envious that you've got a manual. The only manuals I had were already sold so I had to be nice to them...dammit.

So you were importing them???.If so who was compliancing them as i might have one of your old cars.Ive been a bit wrong in my posts as my car has button clutch and boost upped.But while my gtt is either spinning the wheels off the line or not enough revs and waiting for boost my missus already in second gear, top end she gets wrecked tho as the bird has short power bands.

Ah, found it...

http://www.importforums.com/information.htm

This was the info I was going on in my assumption of the bluebird being slightly faster than skyline, 0-100 atleast (by a whopping 0.06 seconds!)

Admittedly Skylinegeoff your knowledge is very good, but in you're "battle of wit's against those unarmed", is knowledge/remembering things witty or just, knowledge? Not wit by the definition I know gunslinger, but I have been known to propagate misinformed sh!t - just see above!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...