Jump to content
SAU Community

Foglights? Got Told Off By A Cop... Pretty Sure It Comes On Standard Mate...


Recommended Posts

for example HIDS are actually illegal in Britain but many cars now come with them stock

HID's aren't illegal in Britain :( Fitting HID's to a car not designed for HID's is illegal, same as most places in the world.

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Interesting little fact most Aussies dont know, in most European countries you are required to drive around with daytime driving lights to make the car more visible. This may include the low beams automatically coming on when the vehicle is started or other additonal white/yellow/amber lighting. Seems in Aus we are the complete opposite lol.

Maybe that's because most European summers are like our winter :(

Actually I've been to quite a few places in Europe, I stayed in Italy for 4 months. But don't you think that weather would have an influence on visibility? That's all I was saying, maybe it's not your point, it was just a comment.

HID's aren't illegal in Britain :D Fitting HID's to a car not designed for HID's is illegal, same as most places in the world.

Actually they are would you like to read a copy of the legilastion????

http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roadsafety/drs/hidheadlamps

please take note of the following

Under these Regulations, HID/Gas Discharge/Xenon headlamps are not mentioned and therefore they are not permitted according to the strict letter of the law.

Edited by jjskyline79
Maybe that's because most European summers are like our winter :D

well Britain at least yes

the high way code says something along the lines of lights shall be used when it's dark and in adverse weather conditions. The sun shining in the uk could be classed as an adverse weather condition.

Actually they are would you like to read a copy of the legilastion????

http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roadsafety/drs/hidheadlamps

please take note of the following

Under these Regulations, HID/Gas Discharge/Xenon headlamps are not mentioned and therefore they are not permitted according to the strict letter of the law.

Lol ummmm did you even read the link you just gave me :) It pretty much says exactly what I said and even the main heading is what I said "Aftermarket HID headlamps".

However new vehicles have HID headlamps. This is because they comply to European type approval Regulations. The UK cannot refuse to register a vehicle with a European type approval. These are to ECE Regulation 98 (for the HID headlamps which are tested on a rig in a laboratory) and ECE Regulation 48 (Lighting Installation on the vehicle).

So as I said, factory HID headlights that comply to regulations (pretty much every new car nowadays) are legal, even fitting a headlight from a vehicle that came with HID's is legal to do; hence people do projector retrofits. It is only illegal to fit HID's to cars that are not designed for HID's.

In summary it is not permitted to convert an existing halogen headlamp unit for use with HID bulbs. The entire headlamp unit must be replaced with one designed and approved for use with HID bulbs and it must be installed in accordance with the rules stated above.
Edited by PM-R33

I read the entire thing, what on earth are you on about?

If a car has factory HID's that have approval they are legal - FACT

If a car has retrofitted factory HID headlights that have approval into their car that did not come with HID's they are legal - FACT

If a car has fitted HID's into their cars' headlights that are made for halogen bulbs, it is illegal - FACT

Pretty much the same law every where in the world.

God I can't believe im getting into another HID argument.

Are you seriously going to deny those three statements even though those three statements are backed up by the link that you supplied? So you are trying to say that every single new Ferrari, Aston Martin, Lamborghini, BMW, Mercedes, Lexus, Landrover and the dozens of other car manufacturers that use HID's in nearly all their newest cars all have illegal headlights in Britain and can get done for them? Because that is what it appears like you are saying.

Edited by PM-R33

Dose it not say please correct me if im wrong

The following is the legal rationale:

The Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations 1989 regulate the situation in the UK.

Under these Regulations, HID/Gas Discharge/Xenon headlamps are not mentioned and therefore they are not permitted according to the strict letter of the law.

Under the Road Traffic Act 1988 it is an offence to supply, fit or use vehicle parts which are not legal.

now back to fog lights.

Edited by jjskyline79
Do you ride a motorbike?

If not, then I suggest having a go before you start making claims about them being harmless.

I'm sorry, how does this affect motorbike riders? You're trying to tell me you're blinded by low wattage halogen lamps during the day? :)

I'm sorry, how does this affect motorbike riders? You're trying to tell me you're blinded by low wattage halogen lamps during the day? :)

Read the whole thread.

And have you ridden a motorbike on the road?

Dose it not say please correct me if im wrong

The following is the legal rationale:

The Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations 1989 regulate the situation in the UK.

Under these Regulations, HID/Gas Discharge/Xenon headlamps are not mentioned and therefore they are not permitted according to the strict letter of the law.

Under the Road Traffic Act 1988 it is an offence to supply, fit or use vehicle parts which are not legal.

now back to fog lights.

So you are referring to a legislation from 1989 that does not mention a particular type of light that did not exist at the time and a website that is simply saying that as a technicallity since there is no mention of HID's being approved therefore reading the law to a T, it must mean they are not approved.

There is also no mention of LED headlights, therefore they must be illegal according to the law to a T.

Fact is they are not illegal, the context of the law simply is not updated and therefore if you are reading it to a T it classifies anything not mentioned to be not approved, which we all know is not the case since modern lights are approved and have come a long way since 1989. I could probably put money on that if you find a legislation for tail lights there will be no mention of LED lighting, therefore LED tail lights would be illegal under the same technicallity.

You are simply hanging on a small technicallity which is obviously looked over since it is outdated. Therefore please stop telling people the wrong type of information without telling the whole story.

Now back to foglights.

Edited by PM-R33
Dose it not say please correct me if im wrong

The following is the legal rationale:

The Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations 1989 regulate the situation in the UK.

Under these Regulations, HID/Gas Discharge/Xenon headlamps are not mentioned and therefore they are not permitted according to the strict letter of the law.

Under the Road Traffic Act 1988 it is an offence to supply, fit or use vehicle parts which are not legal.

now back to fog lights.

Did you read the heading of the article?

"Fact sheet: Aftermarket HID headlamps"

PM-R33 said:

If a car has factory HID's that have approval they are legal - FACT

If a car has retrofitted factory HID headlights that have approval into their car that did not come with HID's they are legal - FACT

If a car has fitted HID's into their cars' headlights that are made for halogen bulbs, it is illegal - FACT

and he is 100% correct on each point.

If a car is sold with factory HIDs then they are legal.

If you replace factory headlights with factory HIDs, they are legal.

If you whack a set of HIDs into the stock, non-HID fitting, illegal.

More from the article (emphasis is mine):

In the Department's view it is not legal to sell or use after market HID lighting kits, for converting conventional Halogen headlamps to HID Xenon. If a customer wants to convert his vehicle to Xenon HID he must purchase completely new Xenon HID headlamps. The reason for this is that the existing lens and reflector are designed around a Halogen filament bulb, working to very precise tolerances. If one places a HID "burner" (bulb) in the headlamp, the beam pattern will not be correct, there will be glare in some places and not enough light in other places within the beam pattern.

Know, back to phog lites.

Read the whole thread.

And have you ridden a motorbike on the road?

Yes, I've been reading the thread thanks, you may notice my post on the first page :P I'm sorry but I fail to see how a set of low wattage factory fitted halogen lamps make a difference.

audi-a4.jpg

The lights here are virtually the same as the R33 S2 (I've owned one). Being factory fitted they are adjusted correctly. They are a much dimmer light than my factory fitted Xeon's - this is the point I was making.

How can you say a set of FACTORY driving lights can dazzle you more so that a set of headlights? Non- factory lights - yes I'll agree, they are horrible and can point in literally any direction.

And no, I don't ride a motorbike though I do drive at night time..

So you are referring to a legislation from 1989 that does not mention a particular type of light that did not exist at the time and a website that is simply saying that as a technicallity since there is no mention of HID's being approved therefore reading the law to a T, it must mean they are not approved.

There is also no mention of LED headlights, therefore they must be illegal according to the law to a T.

Fact is they are not illegal, the context of the law simply is not updated and therefore if you are reading it to a T it classifies anything not mentioned to be not approved, which we all know is not the case since modern lights are approved and have come a long way since 1989. I could probably put money on that if you find a legislation for tail lights there will be no mention of LED lighting, therefore LED tail lights would be illegal under the same technicallity.

You are simply hanging on a small technicallity which is obviously looked over since it is outdated. Therefore please stop telling people the wrong type of information without telling the whole story.

Now back to foglights.

Mate i dont write the rules thems are the rules for the UK as stupid as it is even if its from 1900 and frozen to death

Yes, I've been reading the thread thanks, you may notice my post on the first page :P I'm sorry but I fail to see how a set of low wattage factory fitted halogen lamps make a difference.

audi-a4.jpg

The lights here are virtually the same as the R33 S2 (I've owned one). Being factory fitted they are adjusted correctly. They are a much dimmer light than my factory fitted Xeon's - this is the point I was making.

How can you say a set of FACTORY driving lights can dazzle you more so that a set of headlights? Non- factory lights - yes I'll agree, they are horrible and can point in literally any direction.

And no, I don't ride a motorbike though I do drive at night time..

Put on a helmet, wipe the inside with a damp cloth, close it, then go go for a drive on dusk.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...