Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sorry to get off topic, but i need some adivce.

I am able to get a TRUST FMIC and piping straight from japan, at a cheaper price.

It is made for an R32 i have been told

I have an R32 Gts-t, with an R34 turbo running 10 and 13.6 psi, has a 2.5' full exhaust.

What size cooler should i get for best results? 600x300x70?

How much will this improve performance?

Cheers!

meshmesh...for what its worth i have driven a Rb25 with a 2530, PFc, and it had a 600 x 300 x 100 Trust tube & fin cooler, and the thing was still super responsive, it also had a Greddy plenum.

I cant see why this cooler (or similar dimensions) wouldnt be a good upgrade for a GTR with 300rwkws, as for new piping, the HKS/Trust piping kits looks the part, dont know if it really needs to be upgraded, i doubt its worth the money though.

Sorry meshmesh, I though I answered the question, let me be more specific

1. what size cooler?

600 X 300 X 115

2. brand? as each maker claims there name to fame eg: pressure drops, flows etc.

Greddy, tube and fin, they use cast end tanks with nice airlfow shape like the Standard GTR intercooler. Check around, the prices vary a lot, we buy from Nengun.

3. do i need new piping "?lbs pm @ ?litres of pipework"

No, standard GTR pipework is OK for your power target.

Hope that helps

Hi Flaps, a standard R33/R34 GTR intercooler would do the job for you. We see around 20 to 25 rwkw increase from using one on an R32 GTST RB20DET, if you maintain the same boost levels at the turbo ie; about 2 psi more at the plenum.

Hope that helps

Just while we are on GTR coolers, i have noticed that like my Type S cooler, the tubes used in the core are rather thin when compared to most other aftermarket cores i have seen... Hybrid, Plazmaman, Micks Metalcraft etc etc

A lot of ppl seem to ask about pressure drops, flow capability, affect on throttle response, but everyone seems to assume that as 'heat exchangers' they are all equal.

Is it just a case of give or take they are all equal, or is there somthing to Nissan and HKS using the tube thickness they do to ensure maximum heat transfer at a given power.

After all in order for heat exchangers to be effecient they need turbulent flow, not exactly desirable for good flow or low pressure drops...like all things in life its a compromise.

__________________

I don't own or work for a workshop

I don't know everything  

__________________

Yeh Right! Between you & warspeed, you guys are too "SMART" for your own booSt's :)

What would this forum be without you guys, thanks heeps. Althought I'm still a little consofused about your formula, in time I'll try to work it out.

  • 1 month later...

Force, I think the Nissan GTR coolers vary slightly depending on which model GTR they came from. Not absolutely certain, but I think R32 cores have one less tube than R33 and R34. Also core thickness changes very slightly (5mm?) as well.

For all practical purposes they are really all the same, if you are thinking of adapting one to another car it does not really matter which one you use.

I am about to take delivery of a '97 R33 GTR which is currently completely stock. I am wanting to do some work to bring horsepower up for weekend track work and have been trying to get as much info regards mods as possible before spending wads of money. Many threads mention going for "as big a FMIC as possible" in the early stages to avoid having to continually upgrade as HP increases. I am unsure at this point, but it would appear from this thread (and please correct me if I am wrong) that the standard R33 GTR intercooler is probably up to the task for most mods.

Hi maccattack,

I'll quote SydneyKid, "Before I can work out whats best I need to know your hp target"

I'm in a similar position at the moment, but as a guide, the SydneyKid flowbenched a stock gtr cooler & they are good for around 300kw at the wheels. Your next bet is the Greedy 600x300x115 using stock piping.

Hey Meshmesh.

Thanks for your comments.

At this point aims are for a staged (ie: bit by bit) increase up to around 300Kw at the wheels. All reading to date seems to imply that cool air equals power, therefore start with the intercooler. In QLD quite often on track temps run high 30 degrees to early 40's, so therefor it is going to be fairly important to keep it as cool as I can. By the sounds of things, the existing cooler isn't bad (in fact quite good), but would chasing 300rwkw (taking into account the ambient temperatures on track) warrant going to a bigger cooler??

At this point aims are for a staged (ie: bit by bit) increase up to around 300Kw at the wheels.

Using stock turbos you'll be lucky to get 250-270~@wheels. If you decide on upgrading your turbos "N1, GT2530 etc", then you'll hit 300+

All reading to date seems to imply that cool air equals power, therefore start with the intercooler. In QLD quite often on track temps run high 30 degrees to early 40's, so therefor it is going to be fairly important to keep it as cool as I can.

COOL AIR EQUALS POWER... That's interesting, I'm so inclined to go with a Water Injection set up see www.h2oinjection.com (Not the water spray over the intercooler - although this will also help) working something out with skylinegeoff when I get around to it. Even though everything I read seems positive, my tuner is against it full stop. :confused:

I would hazard a guess that if running on days of high temp the a water injection set up should help, the only thing that seems to be standard across the board is avoid running WI before the turbo "as this can damage the blades over time".. still looking into it anyhow.

If turbo upgrades (which no doubt in the future will occur) are required, would the standard GTR intercooler be up to the task based on the resultant heat increases or would I need to increase the intercooler size or increase it's cooling capacity with something like the water injection or intercooler sprayer??

the only thing that seems to be standard across the board is avoid running WI before the turbo "as this can damage the blades over time"..

Do not do this, the turbine blades will erode in a suprisingly short amount of time, if not disintegrate.

It would be like running a car with no air filter and pouring in dirt on purpose, straight into the compressor. When a turbine blade is running, it doesnt matter what hits it, dirt or water or whatever, the result would be the same. Not good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
    • Hopefully not, since he knows the fuses work ha ha ha
    • I don't think he's got it on a gauge and on the ECU. I think he's got it on the gauge and on the HPTuners DAq thingo. Remember, we're talking about oil temp here, not something that the ECU is actually interested in for its own sake.
×
×
  • Create New...