Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I joined team underdog when I bought this CA18 S13 :huh:

I expected Baron or Snowy to chime in with some GT-R love...

What I "want" is a GT-R that doesn't get caught by lesser powered cars and that doesn't cost 50% more to build :D

Ok I will chime in now for you :D

I've been reading this with interest. For what it is worth I DO have some GT-R love - I wouldn't be building another one right now if this wasn't the case.

My Blue GT-R I had for 7 years which I bought originally as what you want which was a fast street car I could do some motorsport in. In that time it has been through a zillion different builds depending on what I wanted to do at the time - but when it finally ran its last race it was still essentially a fast street car with a cage. The thing is though even back as a standard package it was still pretty fast by your avergae car standards. With just a Power FC, Exhaust, Cam Gears and Semi's I managed a 1.49 @ PI and we've seen JFK do a 1.22 @ Sandown. The reality is no matter what is under you going faster than those times is going to be more about your head than anything else.

That being said my Blue R34 in the end was only used as a race-car. But even though we had some top results it was comprimised as a race car because it was built originally with a street car in mind. My new White one is being built now soley as a race car and I'm quite sure it will be a lot faster than the old one was as a consequence.

If you want a GT-R I say go for it. If its a street car base you won't win super lap and will get beaten by Newton at Sandown - but you will still be fast enough to be happy - and potentially fast enough to win the right events if you are good enough. If you want real real fast then go light weight and buy an RX7 :)

  • Replies 291
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What do you see to be the main factors differentiating a fast street car that doubles as track capable to a purpose built track car.

A cage, stripped interior including dash, no creature comforts etc?

My Blue car had a cage - but also had things like the full Stereo (including 6 speaker system and a DVD player), full climate control, full interior including all the internal trim, the back seats and floor mats! Obviously front seats were race seats and you couldn't get into the rear at all with the cage but having that in there meant the car was quiet to drive in (so I could hear my stereo!), at the right temperature all the time and was just a generally nice comfortable place to be whether I was racing or driving to events. I drove my car everywhere which was why I wanted it that way. But it weighed in at 1690kgs.

The new car I'm hoping to get down to around 1550kgs or better, but it will be loud, smelly (will probably get some fuel smells from the boot I'm expecting), hot and not a lot of fun to be in when its not going flat out. But it should be faster, more reliable (less mechanical stresses due to less weight) and consequently a more fun race car as well.

What do you see to be the main factors differentiating a fast street car that doubles as track capable to a purpose built track car.

A cage, stripped interior including dash, no creature comforts etc?

Having something similar to Snowy's setup (R32 though) I'll throw my ideas in as well. I have a full weight street set-up and a very nice 3/4 cage - so I'm well over stock weight.

For me, some of the biggest advantages of a race car are (in no particular order)

- you can ditch everything behind the dash and just keep the dash itself, including the heater, water lines, extra wiring loom, sound deadening - some weight there.

- be far more thorough with your cage design

- do a proper job of ducting and cooling without the restrictions of factory equipment and placement

- more agressive weight reduction (remove side intrusion bars, fit lexan windows etc)

- change suspension pick ups to allow for a more track bias and greater adjustment

I've run my street weight setup for 5 years and it's been a great, reliable car. Yep they are more expensive to setup than a 2wd but if money is a critical factor then you can go faster for less in a different car. Comes down to what you are passionate about and what you can afford to be passionate about.

I think the only thing I would do differently is not buy a mint example and mod it for the track. I would buy the straightest, cleanest bodied R32 GT-R I could find with a blown engine and start from there - reckon I would have saved $10k - $15k right there.

Regards

Andrew

Cheers Andrew, I think I've seen your car at winton on one of the WRX Club days?

For me I think I'd buy a built platform purely for the cost savings, it's not as much fun as doing it yourself but I'll get plenty of wrench time maintaining and repairing it I'm sure.

Dutton Victoria in 2007 and Targa Rookie 2009 both of which we won it was making around 380rwkw's.

Last year at Targa Tas Early Modern - which I won for about 30mins before I got DQ'd for running the wrong gearbox (which made no difference in speed for this arguement) I was running around 320rwkws - but the car was FASTER than what it was the year before when it was making 380rwkws as it was much better out of corners. (But will hopefully be back upto around the 350+ mark with it running on E85 now)

But power isn't the major factor at Targa by a long shot. Drew Jorgensons R32 GTR which makes around 320rwkws is an epic race car and has finished as high as 3rd Outright @ Mt Buller getting beaten only by J. Richards in his Porka and one other car.

BUT - I have to personally say that whilst being competative is great I don't think winning is everything. The reality is come TT2011 Early Modern if all things are equal I'm likely to get beaten by Wooster in his R32 GTST and Newton in his EMO IV - both of which will no doubt have costed half of what my car did to build (can add Rick Shaw in his RX7 to that list too if he turns up!) If I was dead keen to win it next year I would have built an R33 400R replica instead of another R34 - but I think you have to love your car first and get results second. I do anyways.

Well if a big phat R34 can come away with some wins and 320awkw, I reckon a 33 could do the same as that's about what I'd be looking for power wise, and likewise maybe a touch more on E85. I'm also willing to do away with some creature comforts for what tiny gain there is.

(Thank you Caltex for getting on board with Holdens Flex Fuel crap so we can all have E85! )

Edited by ActionDan

Top Gear top tip, don't fit lexan. Nissan glass is already light, a local car paid big $$ to replace his glass with lexan...only to find the lexan was heavier.

Edited by sav man

Just to clarify too, what I want is a fast track car that's also capable of being a streeter. Not so much the other way around, it's more important that it be good on the track/sprint/hill climb. I'm willing to change rims/tyres, brake pads, and soften the suspension settings to drive it on the street though. I'd still like air con, but the stereo and back seats I don't care about and I don't mind crawling over a cage :huh:

Top Gear top tip, don't fit lexan. Nissan glass is already light, a local car paid big $$ to replace his glass with lexan...only to find the lexan was heavier.

Yeah true. I was astounded with how light the rear window is on 32's.

I think most guys use lexan for the cock factor..... nothing wrong with cock mind you (i don't like cock, but do have some, only a little though).

I hear Benson loves it.

+ 1 for s14.

This is Ashley Barnetts IPRA s14 and wins its fair share of races even against the IPRA V8 and 4wd mob at Barbagello....here's a link to an example of its most recent performance.

I posted the link because all turbo cars in IPRA run restrictors and the drivers are experienced....so this provides some sort of parity engine mod wise and driver wise. It runs on E85, wears 255 semi's all round. Engine hp isn't huge obviously because of the restrictor.

Average speed was 134klm/h in that above race and top speed is around 225 klms for the car.

That thing is fecking fast !

No more talking about S-Chassis, this thread should now be devoted to all the reasons why GT-Rs are awesome.

:D

Deal, I have a 32 GT-R that i'm just beginning to modify for a little bit of track work I like the whole regular street driven occasional track car thing and a GT-R is almost perfect for those duties, if you keep it sensible and do as much of the work yourself as possible then I think its possible to get away with a reasonably quick car for a reasonable dollar.

Another thing to consider is that the advantage of the GT-R's AWD system or that of any AWD over the RWD is directly proportional to the power output of the car that is, its a bigger advantage the more power you run generate.

This is not to say that there are not high powered real wheel drive cars out there, because any one who tells you that is having a good pull on your leg, just have a look at some of the guys in this thread.

Side note: Snowy what makes the 400R replica a good idea? I'm guessing it comes with 18's so can run bugger brakes and fit the rules? I know it had more power factory but you're allowed to modify a car for Targa anyway aren't you?

You can run 18's on an R32 GTR for Targa (can run +2' on both height and width from factory sizes)

400R for Targa can run a bigger exhaust (normal GT-R's can only run a 3" - 75mm exhaust) plus can run a 2.8L engine. I could do both if I ran my car as a Z Tune (and run bigger turbo's) - but then that puts the car out of Early Modern (1984-2002) and into Mordern against the Lambo's, Porka's and R35's since the Z Tune was technically a 2005 car.

But both of those things on the 400R equate to a LOT of extra HP (the exhaust is the big one!) and the extra engine makes the car better again out of corners which is what you really want in a Targa car.

Ahh I didn't know it was a 2.8L. I'm assuming for cost saving you just get a 2.6 and stroke it rather than using a genuine 2.8L block from Nissan/Nismo 0_0

Edited by ActionDan

you can run a 80mm exhaust in targa, your allowed 15% oversized, and std GT-R is 70mm

I think you can still buy a complete 400r engine from the company that made them (reitec or somthing)

Edited by sav man

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...