Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone.

Well as the title states.

I want to get my R33 re-sprayed. But iv been told by almost everyone that its going to be alot cheaper if i do the sanding and prep.

Iv never sanded a car before. But i defiantly do have common sense.

Im wanting to know the best way to sand the car back, In a step by step way if possible.

Any help/advice will be taken in.

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/332147-sanding-back-my-r33-first-timer/
Share on other sites

Use a solid block! Don't just use your hands as you will only be applying pressure where your finger tips are. Make sure you use a solid block for the whole thing, and if possible it's best to use a curved object when you do curved areas.

ehhh, I would get a random orbit DA sander and do it. don't use super coarse grit. and keep the speed down on the sander, if you turn it to full blast, you can wind up with low spots that you won't notice. 320 grit to start, and finish it with an even finer grit (800 or higher even). sanding down a whole car by hand.... no thanks. Even with the pneumatic sander it will take hours and hours of your time. In the end you are trading time for dollars. It's invaluable experience, but if you only have a day here or there to work on it, you may start to feel like it will never get done.

Yeh lol, I didn't mean to imply that you should do it all by hand. Definitely use an orbital sander. Some bits will have to be done by hand though, which is where my advice comes into it :P

It's really that easy man, just time consuming. Not much advice to be given as it's really not hard.

i got a kind of different suggestion spent several years in painting/detailing cars have come across alot of different situations before but i suggest to paint strip the whole car, fix any dints/low spots as previously mention,ededge prime it the car,hi-fill it and so on ect,ect,ect this way your car will not have a thick layer of paint weighing it down even further you will also observe that you will get a more nicer smoother finish. hope this has helped :/

cheers chris

I know it all sounds good to save some time and do the prep work yourself, but its the prep that can make or break a spray job. If you don't have a well prepared body to start with, your paint won't just hide it, it'll highlight it! There is a reason it costs you more to have the bodywork done properly but its soooo much better to save up the extra and get it done right. I see too many cars driving around with horrible looking "fresh" paintwork, and atleast 9 times out of 10 its just down to trying to save money on 1) preperation and 2) paint materials. Don't skimp on the brand of paint that get used either. For the sake of a coupla hundred bucks savings, just buy a well known brand paint and enjoy a good result.

Yeh lol, I didn't mean to imply that you should do it all by hand. Definitely use an orbital sander. Some bits will have to be done by hand though, which is where my advice comes into it :worship:

It's really that easy man, just time consuming. Not much advice to be given as it's really not hard.

Yeah thanks very much. Very helpful. What about when it comes to fixing scratches?

I know it all sounds good to save some time and do the prep work yourself, but its the prep that can make or break a spray job. If you don't have a well prepared body to start with, your paint won't just hide it, it'll highlight it! There is a reason it costs you more to have the bodywork done properly but its soooo much better to save up the extra and get it done right. I see too many cars driving around with horrible looking "fresh" paintwork, and atleast 9 times out of 10 its just down to trying to save money on 1) preperation and 2) paint materials. Don't skimp on the brand of paint that get used either. For the sake of a coupla hundred bucks savings, just buy a well known brand paint and enjoy a good result.

Yeah i wont be using cheap gear, and its not going to be rushed. thanks for the advice

i got a kind of different suggestion spent several years in painting/detailing cars have come across alot of different situations before but i suggest to paint strip the whole car, fix any dints/low spots as previously mention,ededge prime it the car,hi-fill it and so on ect,ect,ect this way your car will not have a thick layer of paint weighing it down even further you will also observe that you will get a more nicer smoother finish. hope this has helped :worship:

cheers chris

Thanks chris. So basically strip down the whole car. then do all the prep/sanding work?

my best advice to you is for you to go buy a a hood/front bar, or something from a junkyard and try sanding and priming that. if it looks acceptable to you, then move on to the car. I have painted several cars, and let me be honest with you, the first car i painted looked very novice. It was presentable, but just not having any background leads to a lot of setbacks that you will be ill equipped to address once it's too late. practice on junkyard parts and see what happens. if you take anything down to the steel on your car, you will have to be ready to prime it or it will rust, and you'll have to resand. If you primer a piece and don't paint it, the moisture in the air will get into the primer, and it will no longer be a smooth surface. things like that happen, and before you know it, you are redoing everything.

Thanks chris. So basically strip down the whole car. then do all the prep/sanding work?

yeah my advice would be that but as mentioned make sure you prime it not long after to avoid rust as other users have mentioned and try to fill up and low spots/dints

I know it all sounds good to save some time and do the prep work yourself, but its the prep that can make or break a spray job. If you don't have a well prepared body to start with, your paint won't just hide it, it'll highlight it! There is a reason it costs you more to have the bodywork done properly but its soooo much better to save up the extra and get it done right. I see too many cars driving around with horrible looking "fresh" paintwork, and atleast 9 times out of 10 its just down to trying to save money on 1) preperation and 2) paint materials. Don't skimp on the brand of paint that get used either. For the sake of a coupla hundred bucks savings, just buy a well known brand paint and enjoy a good result.

True, but any decent workshop will identify a poorly prepared body and notify you of it. It would be a poor workshop that just accepts a car and starts spraying without checking it out first.

Yeah thanks very much. Very helpful. What about when it comes to fixing scratches?

Fixing scratches is easy, use spray on filler primer. This will fill the scratches and obviously does not need to be primed again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...