Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R32 Gts-t.

i've just been bench-testing my coils, and in particular checking output voltages. does anyone know what the voltage should be? and whether it should stay consistent throughout the rev range?

at idle they seem to sitting around 28,000 volts and as rpm climbs up around midrange, voltage drops down to around 10,000 volts, then most the coils were back up to ~15,000 V by top end (the driver i have for them only outputs up to approx 5500-6000rpm) so beyond that rpm i haven't been able to test.

ideally i'd like to hear from someone who's tested brand new coils and compare results. i'm not optimistic about my coils, they are old so not expecting great things from them. if new coils maintain a consistent voltage throughout the rev range then im putting new coils on the shopping list.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/333110-coil-output-voltage/
Share on other sites

this is how the readout went, the volume and pitch of the spark noise goes up and down with the firing rate. basically just started at idle, went to top, then back down to idle. so you get an idea how the voltage changed.

  • 1 month later...

the only info on the splitfire coils i could find is for the sr20det

here is the link to their page with the info:

http://www.splitfire.com/splitv_disystem_nissan.html

So according to graph 2 i think they are saying that the normal/stock sr20det coils output a stable 20 millijoules up to 8000 rpm, whereas the splitfires output around 30 millijoules.

I also found some info on the ls coils, but he has only measured the peak secondary current and of course is in a different unit of measurement:

"On the LS1 coil there is around 40 milliamps of peak secondary current with 5 milliseconds of dwell time. On the LS2/truck coil (AC Delco D585), there is 120 milliamps!"

this info is from:

http://www.megamanual.com/seq/coils.htm

Maybe some people better versed in electronics can help us out...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...