Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dont think there is a bearing in it either. I've had mine off using the SK DIY timing belt replacement. AFAIK it is two parts bonded together by rubber.????

Ther is a place at 17 Mile Rocks that has Stagea bits. They are in the Yellow Pages. A bit EXXY though, but close.

the only thing i have ever see go wrong with a harmonic balancer is the rubber bonding seperating or the key way flogging out

sounds a bit suss if you ask me

and there is no bearing on a balancer they must be talking about the idler for the timing belt which should always be replaced with the belt

Further to my last i dropped in and inspected myself.

Timing belt had dropped a tooth, timing bearings made the sound of sand when turned, harmonic balancer interior rubber was perishing.

So i went to just jap, and ordered the following

- Gates Racing timing belt kit

- HPI clear timing belt cover (bling bling)

- Ross Tuffbond harmonic balancer

Total cost $1028.70 with a 10% trade discount!

Kinda lucky in a way i caught it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...