Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am looking at building a serious N/A RB for Improved Production racing.

Must be N/A, under 3L, Straight, 6 cylinders and Nissan.

L series and RB are the only 2 that fit these and as the L series is getting a little long in the tooth I think the RB would be the better option. The L series has been proven over many years but it has also been developed to its limit. I think with some effort the RB should be capable of better results.

The goal is 200rwkw.

I expect that this will obviously cost a fair bit and require a lot of work. I want some opinions on what would be required to get there if it can be done.

I have seen a few N/A RB's get around 150 - 164rwkw on these forums so I think it should be possible. I am not after opinions on turbos, v6's, rotary's, Toyotas or anything else. Just simply what is required to get an N/A RB to 200rwkw.

I do not want to buy a ready done car as this simply does not interest me. I enjoy the design and build as much if not more than the racing itself.

Must be below 3L. Must be a straight Nissan 6. Must be N/A. Must run on 102ron fuel as per CAMS rules.

I would also like opinions on the question of Revs vs Displacement.

Option 1. Rb30 bottom end Rb26 head = 3L.

Option 2. Rb30 block Rb26 crank Rb26 head = 2.7L

Option 3. Rb30 block Rb20 crank Rb26 head = 2.6L

2 &3 have superior rod stroke ratios and in theory should rev higher, but will the cubes of the 3L win out.

I am collecting the parts for the build over the coming months. Obviously I will speak to a few engine builders before starting but would like to gather some opinions and knowledge from here 1st.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/334150-200rwkw-na-rb-whats-required/
Share on other sites

rb26 long motor convert to n/a with custom tuned length exhaust mani, itb's, cams etc. should get you your power goal, has been done numerous times in japan, do a search on google, would probably be the most reliable option and simplest to complete.

As I said in the thread that dissapeared, I would be concentrating on mid range torque rather than a peak power number, go the 26/30 add ITB's and cams, compression around 11:1 and rev it as hard as the valve train/bottom end will allow, dont worry about the final peak power number on a dyno....it will mean sweet FA on track if you get dusted up down QRs main strait by a 1600cc corrolla because your car doesnt start making power untill 6000 rpm and is all over by 7500.

then spend the money on some MCAs and big bastard brakes and you will be faster with 150rwkws and an excellent handling/stopping car over a car that you have spent squillings on to get 200rwks and have shithouse brakes/suspension

Plus an RB making an easyish 150-170rwks will be a shit load more reliable than one spinning to 9000+ and making 200.

Im not sure how much circuit expirence you have but there is more to a circuit car than a dyno number.

Actually tyresbro I'm not new, I've been a member since Jan '07, and browsed here long before that. Post counts don't mean much.And yes I have read that thread numerous times but it doesn't come to any real conclusions.

Zebra I may be somewhat new to competitive motorsport but that does not make me a newb. I do understand how a curcuit car works. Suspension, brakes etc are under control. What I want to know is if my chosen car and engine, each of which dictate the other in improved prod, are up to the task of putting competitive power down. I'm trying to find this out now before I outlay money on a base car and engine.

What I would like is people who have experience/knowledge on different aspects of what is needed to share thier opinions on cost and power.

Here is a quote from sydneykid a few years ago. Share what you know/think about this combo.

"One day I will put one of these into a 240/260Z

RB30 block and crank

3.1 litres

13.5 to 1 compression ratio

Polished combustion chambers

272 duration 10.8 mm lift cams

Titanium retainers

Tome valve springs, 55 lbs at the seat

2 mm oversize inlet valves

1 mm oversize exhaust valves

Ported RB26 cylinder head

Ported RB26 inlet, multiple throttle bodies and plenum

Tuned, coned collector extractors

4” titanium exhaust

JE forged pistons

Carrillo rods and rod bolts

ARP main bearing studs

ARP head studs

ACL race series bearings

N1 oil pump, with wide flange drive crank collar

RB26 water pump

Elf LM fuel

Motec ECU

Motec CDI

Mercury outboard coils

WoooHooo……400 bhp here we come….and wouldn’t it sound good"

Now it has to be under 3L so ignore the 3.1L bit. What about the extra revs of a 2.7L setup, would the extra 300cc of the 3L trump it?

That sounds like a good combo, but the 13.5:1 comp may be a might much for a circuit car that needs to run hard for lap after lap on petroleum, 13:1 would be fine for alchohol or E85 though, not sure if IPRA QLD allows E85 or not.

and could prob go bigger on the cams for an atmo engine, get something made to suit a non turbo.

Oh and forget the N1 pump, spend the $$$ on an external pump at a minimum unless you wanna rebuild it after every event

Dry sump would be even better.

Well then, suggestions of my own:

Reduce unsprung weight

- Lightweight pulleys

- Lightweight flywheel

- Lightweight clutch

- Balanced crankshaft

- Lightweight wheels

- Lightweight tyres

- CF driveshaft

- Lightweight drive shafts

- Lightweight cams

- Lightweight brakes

Why? because not only will it lighten your car up and increase acceleration, it works well for dyno figures as you are using more % of the raw combustions from the engine. Should be coupled with decent power mods. By the way this is just a theory lol

Edited by TyresBro

Thanks fellas, thats the kind of stuff I'm after.

I think 102ron fuel is the max allowed from what I've found so far. What comp do you think you could run on that.

What are the biggest practical cams you've seen on other NA engines. I've seen 312' on a 4age I think.

Thanks fellas, thats the kind of stuff I'm after.

I think 102ron fuel is the max allowed from what I've found so far. What comp do you think you could run on that.

What are the biggest practical cams you've seen on other NA engines. I've seen 312' on a 4age I think.

290deg total duration would be a good starting point for an angry NA engine, would need a solid lifter conversion if you were to use a 25 head, or a bucket over shim setup for a 26 and something around 11mm lift, it would need a bit of clearancing of the head.

Best bet would be to speak to a top notch head builder about port work etc as they will really determine what cams will work and a cam grinder will want to know the flow numbers of the head at different lifts.

We can only help you so much over the internets, as im not a cam manufacturer and without seeing flow numbers of the ports its just guess work.

1 more thing - spend more money on the head than the bottom end, as that is where the power is produced.

If there was 2.75" i'd definately get that.

2.5" has very linear power from low to high. Gives more precise throttle adjustment/levels too. Revs faster or more responsive. Lacks the kick in power and i'm guessing max power compared to 3" by feel.

3" is pretty empty down low but is a blast at high rpm (5k and over) like VTEC just kicked in yo. Lack of back pressure makes the throttle feel weak at low RPM and not very precise. Feels like it has more top end power than 2.5".

This is from a guy who just got his cat back changed today.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did this end up working? Did you take some pictures?
    • And finally, the front lower mount. It was doubly weird. Firstly, the lower mount is held in with a bracket that has 3 bolts (it also acts as the steering lock stop), and then a nut on the shock lower mount itself. So, remove the 3x 14mm head bolts , then the 17mm nut that holds the shock in. From there, you can't actually remove the shock from the lower mount bolt (took me a while to work that out....) Sadly I don't have a pic of the other side, but the swaybar mounts to the same bolt that holds the shock in. You need to push that swaybar mount/bolt back so the shock can be pulled out past the lower control arm.  In this pic you can see the bolt partly pushed back, but it had to go further than that to release the shock. Once the shock is out, putting the new one in is "reverse of disassembly". Put the top of the shock through at least one hole and put a nut on loosely to hold it in place. Put the lower end in place and push the swaybar mount / shock bolt back in place, then loosely attach the other 2 top nuts. Bolt the bracket back in place with the 14mm head bolts and finally put the nut onto the lower bolt. Done....you have new suspension on your v37!
    • And now to the front.  No pics of the 3 nuts holding the front struts on, they are easy to spot. Undo 2 and leave the closest one on loosely. Underneath we have to deal with the wiring again, but this time its worse because the plug is behind the guard liner. You'll have to decide how much of the guard liner to remove, I undid the lower liner's top, inside and lower clips, but didn't pull it full off the guard. Same issue undoing the plug as at the rear, you need to firmly push the release clip from below while equally firmly gripping the plug body and pulling it out of  the socket. I used my fancy electrical disconnect pliers to get in there There is also one clip for the wiring, unlike at the rear I could not get behind it so just had to lever it up and out.....not in great condition to re-use in future.
    • Onto the rear lower shock mount. It's worth starting with a decent degrease to remove 10+ years of road grime, and perhaps also spray a penetrating oil on the shock lower nut. Don't forget to include the shock wiring and plug in the clean.... Deal with the wiring first; you need to release 2 clips where the wiring goes into the bracket (use long nose pliers behind the bracket to compress the clip so you can reuse it), and the rubber mount slides out, then release the plug.  I found it very hard to unplug, from underneath you can compress the tab with a screwdriver or similar, and gently but firmly pull the plug out of the socket (regular pliers may help but don't put too much pressure on the plastic. The lower mount is straightforward, 17mm nut and you can pull the shock out. As I wasn't putting a standard shock back in, I gave the car side wiring socket a generous gob of dialectric grease to keep crap out in the future. Putting the new shock in is straightforward, feed it into at least 1 of the bolt holes at the top and reach around to put a nut on it to hold it up. Then put on the other 2 top nuts loosely and put the shock onto the lower mounting bolt (you may need to lift the hub a little if the new shock is shorter). Tighten the lower nut and 3 upper nuts and you are done. In my case the BC Racing shocks came assembled for the fronts, but the rears needed to re-use the factory strut tops. For that you need spring compressors to take the pressure off the top nut (they are compressed enough when the spring can move between the top and bottom spring seats. Then a 17mm ring spanner to undo the nut while using an 8mm open spanner to stop the shaft turning (or, if you are really lucky you might get it off with a rattle gun).
    • You will now be able to lift the parcel shelf trim enough to get to the shock cover bolts; if you need to full remove the parcel shelf trim for some reason you also remove the escutcheons around the rear seat release and you will have to unplug the high stop light wiring from the boot. Next up is removal of the bracket; 6 nuts and a bolt Good news, you've finally got to the strut top! Remove the dust cover and the 3 shock mount nuts (perhaps leave 1 on lightly for now....) Same on the other side, but easier now you've done it all before
×
×
  • Create New...