Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If there was 2.75" i'd definately get that.

2.5" has very linear power from low to high. Gives more precise throttle adjustment/levels too. Revs faster or more responsive. Lacks the kick in power and i'm guessing max power compared to 3" by feel.

3" is pretty empty down low but is a blast at high rpm (5k and over) like VTEC just kicked in yo. Lack of back pressure makes the throttle feel weak at low RPM and not very precise. Feels like it has more top end power than 2.5".

This is from a guy who just got his cat back changed today.

This is a race car though, and the way to do a race car exhaust is just dump the exhaust primary's into the biggest bastard exhaust system you can fit under the car, who cares if the car feels a bit weak driving around the pit garages, the actual exhaust pipe has very little to do with how the car makes power, thats all in the primaries ala extractors.

I think you should go RB30 with a stroker crank. Spool have a 3.4L option (or you could go custom) along with max oversize pistons. It will limit your revs to about 8000rpm but is a better option, and would sound tough. If people can and have hit 170's and 180's with relatively mild builds (mild in comparison to what is possible and how spastic you can go with cams, revs and even compression) 200kw with a 3.4 (or possibly 3.5 combined with max oversize??) should be similarly achievable providing you can get it to flow the air.

Edited by SKiT_R31
This is a race car though, and the way to do a race car exhaust is just dump the exhaust primary's into the biggest bastard exhaust system you can fit under the car, who cares if the car feels a bit weak driving around the pit garages, the actual exhaust pipe has very little to do with how the car makes power, thats all in the primaries ala extractors.

Yes, but as the exhaust diameter told me, depending on how much power you make or mods, a bigger exhaust diameter will push the powerband higher but thinner so a compromise is a must. Also with the lack of back pressure, the throttle feel was on or off which I don't think is good for racing.

EDIT: There was a VERY noticeable difference in power with 75% throttle and 100%.

Edited by TyresBro
I think you should go RB30 with a stroker crank. Spool have a 3.4L option (or you could go custom) along with max oversize pistons. It will limit your revs to about 8000rpm but is a better option, and would sound tough. If people can and have hit 170's and 180's with relatively mild builds (mild in comparison to what is possible and how spastic you can go with cams, revs and even compression) 200kw with a 3.4 (or possibly 3.5 combined with max oversize??) should be similarly achievable providing you can get it to flow the air.

This does sound good but I want to keep in the under 3L class.

Does anyone have any idea on the price of getting a serious NA head built, excluding head as I already have that.

I hevent read th thread.

But in my opinion, the benefits you will gain from using a 26 head a not worth spending the extra money as opposed to a 25 head.

26 head = ~ 2K

25 head = ~$500

Take the difference in $1500 and spend it on the engine.

As far as I am concerned. Power figures when it comes to NA engines are dependent on 2 things:

1) intake runner length

2) compression ratio

my advise. If you want good power figure (throwing out drivablility):

Reduce weight: lighten the bottom end, balance it, lighten the box (including clutch and flywheel) driveshafts/s and diff (spool diff would be nice) this will let the engine rev harder and faster.

Tune runner length: the shorter the the intake runner length (yes, ITB's ARE worth it!!!!) the narrower the power band will be, the higher in the rev range it will be, but the more power it will produce. this is ESSENTIAL to get right with the next step

Cam profile: You want a nice healthy valve overlap to get as much fresh air into the engine as possble. Cam lift and duration will be dependent on alot of factors including the runner length, volume of the engine and ecu tune.

Exhause manifold: No. Coby extractors will not do the job properly. Get it built from scratch, get it tuned right (spend the 1.5K difference here and the ecu, and ITB's, the benifits will far outweigh a 26 head!!!!)

the right Juice: tune with and run E85 (you will have to use e85 friendly fuel system - or drain it after every drive) 109 octane etc. for best results

200NA kw is easily acheivable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's restrictor pills in the stock boost control hoses. That's how they set the amount that was bled off and hence the "high" boost setting. The usual mod in the day was to remove it and send the "high" boost setting up to about 14 psi.
    • Thanks Duncan, that's the best info I've read. Furthermore after learning about the PCM programming side controlling the factory boost solenoid, the purpose of the solenoid is to "bleed" boost when pin 25 is earthed, thus allowing spring pressure in the wastegate actuator to overcome diaphragm boost pressure, thus closing or reducing the position of the wastegate flap creating more boost as the turbo is able to spin faster. It's pretty cool to see a designated Pill to do exactly this, would have liked to have seen it with a tiny filter over the end for those moments in vacuum.  The constant bleed pill has now been removed completely from the system and solenoid boost control has been restored once again.   Case closed 😂
    • The wideband reading is meaningless if it's not running. Why are you using shitty old sidefeeds on any engine, let alone a Neo? What manifold and fuel rail are you using to achieve that? Beyond that, can't help you with AEM stuff as I've never been their ECU/CAS combo.
    • Manual boost controllers (where a little of the boost was bled off) were quite common back in the day, because they were cheap and easy. Generally they had a manual adjustment screw rather than being fixed like yours. Down side is they always bleed boost, not just when you want them to so an electronic boost controller that uses a solenoid will have less lag.
    • Hello , im new here and i have A31 home build  RB25det neo stock eng / turbo  aem ems 2 blue connector  aem 3.5 map aem cas disk aem wideband connected to ecu  355 lph pump 550 nismo yellow injectors side feed aftermarket regulator  and won’t start with base aem tuner basic tune eventually flipped cas 180 degree so it triggers on correct stroke not in exhaust cycle  Now it won’t start Wideband reads 10 and 11 at lowest fuel setting  and will share calibrations soon for aem tuner i think something is wrong in aem tuner    please if you have any information, am very grateful         
×
×
  • Create New...