Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I did the RB25DET conversion on my R32 about 6 years ago...

If I were to go back in time and do it all again, I'd put a RB26DETT in instead. Heaps easier option with respect to the wiring, and a better platform to start with.

Although the engine is initially more expensive, it will already come with a front mount, front facing plenum etc. So that will be money you don't need to spend later down the track.

With the R33 engine, you will lose the HICAS (no problem for me as I'd already removed it all) but I still don't have the aircon step-up or speed variable power steering working. I've just learned to live without it.

By the way I'm still using the RB20DET gear box, and it has been holding up fine with 250 rwkw. So work out how much power you will be after, before deciding on replacing the gearbox.

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

With the R33 engine, you will lose the HICAS (no problem for me as I'd already removed it all) but I still don't have the aircon step-up or speed variable power steering working. I've just learned to live without it.

All good points except this one, if you use the rb20 ecu then you get to keep all of this stuff.

All good points except this one, if you use the rb20 ecu then you get to keep all of this stuff.

True, however I wanted to replace the computer with a Power FC and I also didn't want to loose the variable valve timing. I realise there once was the AP Engineering Power FC for the RB20DET, but this was big bucks at the time.

I did the RB25DET conversion on my R32 about 6 years ago...

If I were to go back in time and do it all again, I'd put a RB26DETT in instead. Heaps easier option with respect to the wiring, and a better platform to start with.

Although the engine is initially more expensive, it will already come with a front mount, front facing plenum etc. So that will be money you don't need to spend later down the track.

With the R33 engine, you will lose the HICAS (no problem for me as I'd already removed it all) but I still don't have the aircon step-up or speed variable power steering working. I've just learned to live without it.

By the way I'm still using the RB20DET gear box, and it has been holding up fine with 250 rwkw. So work out how much power you will be after, before deciding on replacing the gearbox.

Would the RB26 be too much power for the GTS-T to handle? What would I have to do to make sure the car performs well with it?

The wiring matches up?

Would the RB26 be too much power for the GTS-T to handle? What would I have to do to make sure the car performs well with it?

The wiring matches up?

Same as any powerful engine, suspension, good grippy tyres etc.

Would the RB26 be too much power for the GTS-T to handle? What would I have to do to make sure the car performs well with it?

The wiring matches up?

The wiring is much easier, as the engine loom will all plug in to your existing looms. Then later on down the track when you are chasing more power, there are plenty of aftermarket ECU options.

Are you worried about having too much power?? There's no such thing! But in any case, a standard RB26 will work well in a GTSt, then depending on what power level you are after later on down the track (ie. greater than 250 rwkw) would dictate whether you need to replace the gearbox.

The wiring is much easier, as the engine loom will all plug in to your existing looms. Then later on down the track when you are chasing more power, there are plenty of aftermarket ECU options.

Are you worried about having too much power?? There's no such thing! But in any case, a standard RB26 will work well in a GTSt, then depending on what power level you are after later on down the track (ie. greater than 250 rwkw) would dictate whether you need to replace the gearbox.

So that easy to put in a 26? What about the slump? I was told that you have to cut it. What is the slump exactly?

Is this hard to do? Is this the only thing that needs to be done to fit a RB 26 into a R32 GTS-T?

Not as hard as sorting out the wiring drama with the RB25...

The drama with the sump is because of the AWD system, so you have two options:

Remove the front wheel drive system from the RB26 sump, and then weld up the holes, or:

Replace the RB26 sump, with one from a RB25, though I believe you will also have to modify the oil pickups, as they are not the same as the RB25.

Not as hard as sorting out the wiring drama with the RB25...

The drama with the sump is because of the AWD system, so you have two options:

Remove the front wheel drive system from the RB26 sump, and then weld up the holes, or:

Replace the RB26 sump, with one from a RB25, though I believe you will also have to modify the oil pickups, as they are not the same as the RB25.

Ok

So if I can find a decent price RB26, than it will be easier to connect everything.

With the RB 20 wiring with the 25 engine, besides having to have a switch for the VCT, is there anything else that will have to be rewired differently?

Can I use the RB20 computer and use a EManage instead of the Nistune?

So it sounds like the rb 20 loom is the better way to go. Only the engine, and transmission will change? So Hicas wont work after the engine change?

How much does Nistune cost?

If I go the 25 computer and loom, I will need what other sensors and parts?

If you go that way you will need all the engine sensors a full loom and ecu, then you will have to patch that loom into the chassis.

Would the RB26 be too much power for the GTS-T to handle? What would I have to do to make sure the car performs well with it?

The wiring matches up?

A 26 in a 32gts-t is one of my favorite combo's.... it's not easy to achieve though. Especially in jap land where labour/fabrication is expensive.

Ok

So if I can find a decent price RB26, than it will be easier to connect everything.

With the RB 20 wiring with the 25 engine, besides having to have a switch for the VCT, is there anything else that will have to be rewired differently?

Can I use the RB20 computer and use a EManage instead of the Nistune?

I wouldn't bother with a 26 in your situation, you don't have the knowledge or skills to do it yourself and it's going to be very expensive to get somone to do it for you.

The rb25 swap can be all but plug and play... Get yourself a low km series 1 rb25. Swap over the rb20 sensors to the rb25, drop the 25 in and plug the loom in. You can do the rest with the e-manage (not a great option) or other ecu.

Remove the CAS, AFM, TPS, temp sensors, pressure sensors/switches, ignitor module/coil packs/coil pack loom, etc from the rb20 and install it all onto the rb25. Remove the injector loom from the rb20, cut the injector plugs off and solder on the rb25 injector plugs onto the rb25 loom. The rb20 AC pump, alternator and power steering pump should all bolt up to the rb25 too.... so the wiring stays the same for tem too.

Just do what you would do if you were going to replace the rb20 with another 'undressed' rb20 long block. The ecu won't know you magically added 500cc.

As for the hicas, remove the hicas ecu/pump/lines etc and install a hicas lock bar.... hicas was a bad idea from the start, so ditch it.

If you go that way you will need all the engine sensors a full loom and ecu, then you will have to patch that loom into the chassis.

A 26 in a 32gts-t is one of my favorite combo's.... it's not easy to achieve though. Especially in jap land where labour/fabrication is expensive.

I wouldn't bother with a 26 in your situation, you don't have the knowledge or skills to do it yourself and it's going to be very expensive to get somone to do it for you.

The rb25 swap can be all but plug and play... Get yourself a low km series 1 rb25. Swap over the rb20 sensors to the rb25, drop the 25 in and plug the loom in. You can do the rest with the e-manage (not a great option) or other ecu.

Remove the CAS, AFM, TPS, temp sensors, pressure sensors/switches, ignitor module/coil packs/coil pack loom, etc from the rb20 and install it all onto the rb25. Remove the injector loom from the rb20, cut the injector plugs off and solder on the rb25 injector plugs onto the rb25 loom. The rb20 AC pump, alternator and power steering pump should all bolt up to the rb25 too.... so the wiring stays the same for tem too.

Just do what you would do if you were going to replace the rb20 with another 'undressed' rb20 long block. The ecu won't know you magically added 500cc.

As for the hicas, remove the hicas ecu/pump/lines etc and install a hicas lock bar.... hicas was a bad idea from the start, so ditch it.

What is the CAS and TPS? So the engine will operate fine with the stock computer? What is suggested to use the VCT with? To control it?

What about the fuel pump, should I change that to a bigger one?

No the computer will need to be remapped to suit the rb25 engine, a nistune is the best option but an epprom remap with the standard rb25 map will do if you haven't done any modifications.

VCT can be controlled via a MSD switch, an eboost street boost controller or any other auxiliary window output controller.

No the computer will need to be remapped to suit the rb25 engine, a nistune is the best option but an epprom remap with the standard rb25 map will do if you haven't done any modifications.

VCT can be controlled via a MSD switch, an eboost street boost controller or any other auxiliary window output controller.

So what is a MSD switch? An eboost street boost controller is any boost controller? Auxiliary window output controller is what?

I am sorry, I am learning here.

MSD make a window switch, eg it enables an output during a window of revs. The standard rb25 computer enables the VCT between 1500 and 4500 rpm I think, so the switch takes the RPM input and when the rpm is between that window it turns on the output, the output then enables the VCT solenoid.

An eboost street is a boost controller but it also has a window output controller built into it which can be used for this purpose, there however are various other solutions out there, you will have to do some research and talk to whoever you are planning this conversion with as it doesn't sound like you will be the one wiring it all up anyway.

What is the CAS and TPS? So the engine will operate fine with the stock computer? What is suggested to use the VCT with? To control it?

What about the fuel pump, should I change that to a bigger one?

CAS is Crank Angle Sensor and TPS is Throttle Position Sensor.

The engine won't operate correctly with the stock ecu... you will need to re-tune the stock ecu or use a piggy back etc.

I use a simple rpm window switch sold by JEGS in the US to controll the VCT.

Change the fuel pump.... by now it's at least 15 years old if it's the origional. You should be able to find a suitable drop in replacment from nismo etc... or even a low km GTR pump.

If you do go ahead with the swap, double whatever budget you work out... trust me. Also, before you install the new engine get it checked (you don't want to go through all this just to find out it's a dud) and replace ALL the service items- belts, timing belt/idler bearing, clutch etc... I'd also advise replacing the water pump and oil pump for a N1 pump with a crank collar if your going to modify the new engine.

The rb20 gearbox won't put up with alot of torque and abuse... go with the rb25 box.

Cheers

Justin

Walbro GS342 (I think that is the model) is drop in, quiet and fairly cheap replacement. Doesn't flow as much as a bosch 044 but is far quieter and fine for stock power levels.

You are supposed to replace the clutch too?

How is the Nismo fuel pump?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...