Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

If these are still here next tuesday, they're mine!!!!!

Will let you know if it's still here... which I doubt considering how much I'm asking.

i dunno if these will fit on the inside. i was running 17x9 +19 on the front of my 33 and my car isn't the lowest skyline on the road and it didn't have much space before it was going to touch the suspension.

these are 18x10 and +19 on the front. so this will sit in the guards another cm and a bit. it would be very close. rears are no problem. probs a test fit is in order lol.

Straight swap for Volk GTC 17x8 front, 17x9 rear? I think offsets are around +20...

msg me on 0401 682 270 if interested on working something out.

Dean

As tempting it may sound but I'll have to pass it up as I own a GTR and these will be useless.

Just texted ya

$1000 with nuts to fairfield Heights?

Texted you back, will try to get back to you with size and weight for boxes shortly, left the paper in car.

lol jump on em why wait! they'll look sharp on your car

You buy!

Because I need to wait till next pay... You buy em! They'll look sick on a white car

You buy!

i dunno if these will fit on the inside. i was running 17x9 +19 on the front of my 33 and my car isn't the lowest skyline on the road and it didn't have much space before it was going to touch the suspension.

these are 18x10 and +19 on the front. so this will sit in the guards another cm and a bit. it would be very close. rears are no problem. probs a test fit is in order lol.

You're welcome to test fit if these are still around, but don't hold your breath.

Man up for christ sake, i run 18x9 with a 0 offset on my 33, fit just nice with a pull of the guard.

:D

nice rims mate, just gotta find the right buyer, sold mine for 1850 last week, i put the add up, got a text within an hour or so and they were sold,

same offset but in white, were on my 33gtr,

best of luck with the sale, very good price, thes are very rare and very lightwight 6.9kg a rim i think

Cheers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...