Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I have been wondering for a while now are either of these cars real or 3D rendered??? I apologise if this has been asked before.

Let me know your thoughts cos if the Yellow one is real i want that Kit ;) hehe

Cheers :blink:

post-76478-1284389961_thumb.jpg

post-76478-1284390088_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/336713-real-or-3d-created/
Share on other sites

PM-R33 Not every one has your apparent awesome ability to pick these things mate, some of the things people are doing these days with cars are awesome so excuse me for thinking that there may be a remote chance for someone to do that to a car.

But cheers for your comment though ;)

PM-R33 Not every one has your apparent awesome ability to pick these things mate, some of the things people are doing these days with cars are awesome so excuse me for thinking that there may be a remote chance for someone to do that to a car.

Nope, you aint being excused. It has nothing to do with my "awesome ability", it's the fact the cars could not look any more photoshopped/fake if they tried. To think those cars were real when they clearly look fake as hell just shows me you are either 11 years old or have a problem with your vision.

would you honestly think this one is real?

gtr_800.jpg

no.

but it is..

ori.jpg

people do amazing things with photoshop these days :P

I hardly call that "real" for fucks sake. Just because an original photo was used to create something in Photoshop that doesn't resemble the original photo in any way shape or form does not class something as being real.

Edited by PM-R33

So? The OP asked whether the cars he posted were real. The answer was no, clear as day. Whether they started off as a photo of a cat strapped to a horse and then photoshopped into a GTR has got nothing to do with it.

Hardly call it passion. You asked a stupid question, i was amazed how such a stupid question could be asked (and still am). You start giving me a bit of lip, so I put you in your place. Pretty simple really.

  • 2 weeks later...

By the looks of it they have been rendered from real photos in photoshop using a technique called HDR.

You can learn about HDR here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_dynamic_range_imaging

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials...namic-range.htm

It's pretty awesome and I want to get into it when I get the time. If you type HDR into google images you'll see some awesome examples.

Edited by Owens
Hardly call it passion. You asked a stupid question, i was amazed how such a stupid question could be asked (and still am). You start giving me a bit of lip, so I put you in your place. Pretty simple really.

Dude your talking to a guy with a GTSt wearing a GT-R badge. No wonder he's thick

av-76478.jpg

Dude your talking to a guy with a GTSt wearing a GT-R badge. No wonder he's thick

av-76478.jpg

Dude, your talking to a guy with a GTSt with a GTSt badge, that car is not mine but just a car I like the look of, thought that may have been a little obvious with the plates on the car ;) oh but thats right I am the thick one :banana:

Edited by nthside_skyline

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...