Jump to content
SAU Community

Lpg Conversion On A R33 And No Dynometer

samuri
 Share

Recommended Posts

samuri Rising Star

samuri

Posted
Posted

I have a non turbo 1996 skyline which has just beeen converted to LPG.

The Dyno was broken and couldnt be used so the car was tuned in the garage.

Will there be any or much difference if I go back and ask for a dyno tune when the dynometer is fixed up?

If it was a turbo would your response be any different?

I suspect the fuel econmy could be better but I am still getting used to the conversion.

The system is SVI (sequential vapour injection) and I am assuming an extra 20% fuel consumption compared to petrol.

FrangaR33 Mentor

FrangaR33

Posted
Posted (edited)
What do you mean by it was tuned in the garage :banana:

+1

To the OP you definetly have to get it dyno tuned under load otherwise its all just guess work by the tuner and a close enough approach that is most likely going to run rich eating fuel like crazy. Using guess work you gotta be on the safe side so they definetly cant have you coming back with your engine blown to pieces because they cbf fixing their dyno.

There would most likely be a world of difference in terms of both response and economy if it is taken back and tuned properly.

Out of curiousity what ECU are you using for the conversion?

Edited by FrangaR33
samuri Rising Star

samuri

Posted
  • Author
Posted
+1

To the OP you definetly have to get it dyno tuned under load otherwise its all just guess work by the tuner and a close enough approach that is most likely going to run rich eating fuel like crazy. Using guess work you gotta be on the safe side so they definetly cant have you coming back with your engine blown to pieces because they cbf fixing their dyno.

There would most likely be a world of difference in terms of both response and economy if it is taken back and tuned properly.

Out of curiousity what ECU are you using for the conversion?

The conversion was an EMER system supplied by Aust warehouse LPG. Does thta help with the ECU type?Where would I look?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • sinn3r
      R34 Skyline climate control unit transistor

      By sinn3r · Posted

      Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • Kinkstaah
      Blue slip

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • GTSBoy
      Best place to order Authetic R32 Parts in Japan

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • GTSBoy
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • GTSBoy
      Blue slip

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...