Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Specs:

R32 RB25DE NA Head - $750 (purchase) + $880 (Rebuild/Work)

Stock cams

Inlet 240dur 7.8mm Lift

Exhaust 232dur 7.3mm Lift

Very mild port & polish job mainly concentrating on the bowl area of the exhaust port.

Inlet valves deshrouded

Inlet valve seats have had a 3 angle seat job done.

Exhaust valves have had another type of seat job that is best for the airflow direction.

Head, manifolds & plenum port matched.

Stainless Steel Headgasket with built in O-Ring (Looks like it has 3 layers?!)

Series II VL Commodore RB30E NA Short Motor - $3450

Crack Tested - Crank, Rods & Block.

87mm RB25DET Wiesco forged pistons ~8.5:1CR

RB25DET oil pump <- Thanx Clint32.

Nissan Rod bolts

Nissan Head bolts

King Performance Bearings

Blue printed

RB20DET Flywheel <- Thanx Clint32.

Balanced using the Heinz Balancer to 1 gram

A few extra charges:

Face Flywheel - $50

Fit Head, Drill & Tap Tensioner above waterpump & fit cam belt - $200

Cam Belt - $38.50

Chris Milton Engineering worked on the head, the head had to be sent back which cost me another $80 as they missed a protruding exhaust valve seat on No. 5 combustion chamber. The protruding valve seat would have caused detonation. So yer.. you guessed it.. Not happy.

Darren (Bl4ck32) is also getting his motor built up with virtually the same specs. Maybe this is why we were quoted such a good price on the bottom end.

City Dismantlers with Andrew the wizz who is rebuilding the engine & doing a little bit of research in order to make me happy with the final compression ratio.

He definately knows his stuff & has worked on many performance RB30's in the past, he is easy to talk to and has put up with me and my friggin questions. :)

He sets a fixed price from the beginning and it doesn't change. He uses all of the latest machinery (Heinz Balance to 1 gram) and is very thorough (crack test block/crank/rods).

Well what can I say.... Can't wait. :headspin:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34114-the-new-motor-update-12th-march-04/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

OHHH YEAH! :wassup:

Also to the list are the support system upgrades (for me) :

HKS 3037s

550cc injectors

AP Engineering Power FC + Hand controller

Bosch fuel pump

Rb25det gearbox + single piece tailshaft

And sum 17" deep dish mofo's to get it to see the ground. :P

sweet, cant wait to see both your beasts up and prowling the streets, where can I book in for a ride?:P:D:D

Good things are worth waiting for, just be careful as fits of laughter and huge shit eating grins when you are driving make you look like you have been up to something:p

Yeah, done some research on bearings. Here's a page on the clevites :

http://engineparts.com/products/trimetal.html

If u read it, it explains about bimetal and trimetal bearings. Then have a look at King bearings page:

http://www.kingbearings.com/advantages.html

Wow I didnt realise rebuilds were this cheap. I always thought they were mega $$$!. I was thinking about getting my SR20 a freshen up sometime...

What is the expected power output? 300rwkw should be crossed relatively easily!!

The $3500 is just for the motor. It doesn't include installation / tuning. Joel and myself are doin the hard work of removing / installing the new motors.

I'd hope the 300rwkw would be crossed, but over 350 u need to go forged rods etc...$$ Its hard when to say stop when spending on parts but it snowballs if u cant put a limit on power. Were aiming for reliability as well.

The $3500 is just for the motor. It doesn't include installation / tuning. Joel and myself are doin the hard work of removing / installing the new motors.

I'd hope the 300rwkw would be crossed, but over 350 u need to go forged rods etc...$$ Its hard when to say stop when spending on parts but it snowballs if u cant put a limit on power. Were aiming for reliability as well.

$3500 is still very cheap, surprised u didnt get a high volume oil pump and large + baffeled sump also. What turbo is going on this system and what power are you looking for?

I cant speak for joel, but if i could have stretched for the extras (they were on the cards believe me) i would have.

I asked Andrew about the oil pump and he said Mark Tilbrook built a motor that was similar and used the std rb30 oil pump.

These are mainly street engines, with maybe the one trip down the 1/4 or out at Mallala.

Turbo is listed above.

A few reasons. 3037 ProS has t3 flange i believe. Bolts on to std. manifold. (trying to keep costs down again :))

A mainfold + ext. wastegated turbo = instant defect.

As Joel said :

Can use the stock manifold etc. + from Greenline by the time I buy external gate custom manifold etc the price works out more than the ProS.. Guess I will find out if that is to be true when I drop the motor in the car. Always hidden costs that you forget about.

My car is in final stages of getting built, hoping to tune tomorrow with garret 3040, custom high mount manifold and 45mm ext race gate and all the other goodies you need to support.

I was advised if i wanted realiable/responsive hp to ditch the stock cast manifold coz its rubbish. I know people will say "I made over 300rwkw with the stock manifold" that not the point, as screw in enough boost and you will make high hp but just how efficient and responsive it comes on is what matters.

Just food for thought.

INANST,

The oil pump we are using which bumps the price up to 4k is a R32 GTR pump. So yer it is a high flow pump ample for the RB30DET single turbo. I was considering the N1 pump however Andrew said if its only a higher pressure pump stick with the std. GTR pump as the higher pressure is not always good for a low reving street motor. It is fine for a motor that spins up to 9k. The GTR pump will supply ample oil even if I do end up baffling the sump and using it for the occasional track day to stick it in third with low rev's out of a corner and power past STEVE! heheh :P

The HKS3037ProS on the stock manifold will be fine, remember its a 3ltr so the engine is going to be much more responsive compared to the RB25DET. The point is we don't have a money tree and have to start drawing the line some where. I doubt having a nice exhaust manifold will make that much difference. Well not 1k worth of a difference. :)

If I did have an extra 1k I would much prefer to get a set of cams to help bring the peak power up to around 7000rpm.

Have you driven a RB20DET then jumped in to a RB25DET, huge difference in bottom end torque/spool speed. Sitting in the passenger seat you don't notice it, drive it and you will walk away glad to get back in your 2.5ltr.

Sure you may be able to pick up a little bit of response with an after market exhaust manifold but not enough to worry me, what would worry me more is if the cops saw a non std. exhaust manifold/gate.

From other peoples experience the stock RB exhaust manifold starts running in to problems up around 320rwkw. Hits a brick wall if you like, you can keep pumping in the boost but she won't make any more power. Even then at that power level a set of nice tyres or better diff is going to make more of a difference than a exhaust manifold. I guess it comes down to the individuals prioritys and what they seee as the best bang for buck.

Picked up the clutch today.

Its an Xtreme Extra Heavy Duty (Just over 1000kg's) Cushioned Ceramic Button Clutch. I think thats what its called. :( Tim's had one in a Supra that was/is making 308rwkw with no reliability problems as it is still in the car today.

What Clutch are you running Matt?

I got that same clutch joel in mine, but i think your are kidding yourself too much saying a well made high mount manifold will only help alittle bit. The stock manifold is just like the other stock parts on the car, exhaust, turbo, intercooler, they are all made on a cost per basis budget. U know the stock cooler, turbo and exhaust system aint the best, so dont think the manifold is anything special either.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...