Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

So i had an accident with a roo a month ago.

Insurance has taken their sweet time repairing it.

Getting the car back soon.

Anyway the panel beater said that that the assessment guys said there's a fault with the bearing where my cam gears are but they are not fixing it.

Here's the problem. I purchased the car 1 day before i had the accident so i know there definitely wasn't an issue before the accident.

Insurance won't cover it unless i go get a mechanical report saying that the bearing is a result of the accident.

So anyone know what it would roughly cost to fix the bearing? Is it an easy job?

A mechanical report would be about 300 and that's no guarantee that the issue is a result of the accident.

Just need to figure out what is my best option/solution!

Thanks.

Edited by starscream_r32
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341950-cam-gear-bearing-issuefault/
Share on other sites

no bearing in the cam gears... they are just a gear bolted to the end of the camshaft. unless your car has some kind of VCT?

i agree only thing i can thin of that he istalking about is the variable timing clutch or whatever hey call it that wuld cost you around the $300 mark correct me if im wrong

What about the timing belt tensioner bearing or idler?

If the front timing cover is bent or buckled in ANY way then the damage is a result of the accident. I would normally charge 2-2.5hrs for a belt/bearing change (seals and water pump are obviously extras) and your average workshop would charge around $90-$100/hr. The bearings are gonna cost approx $150-$200 for the pair

its probably humming like the blue gates belts..... they figure it is the bearings damaged from accident? not familiar with noisy RB cambelts (overtight).

hey status.. thanks for the reply.

so what does that mean?

it's normal/okay if its humming? or is there a fix?

for the others.. that's all he really told me.. that there's a noise coming from where cam gears are and it's a bearing.

as far as i can remember.. when i hit the roo impact was so strong that the car/engine cut out for a sec and the fan was pushed right against my radiator and could not spin freely anymore n yeah..

i haven't got the car back yet.. but tying to do some investigation..

so i guess the cost to fix it will be the same as a mechanic report.. damm insurance are smart... they know the cost to get a report is the same to fix it so they say i need the report to avoid more cost from repair.. grr!

anyone can shed some light or confirm the above posts?

thanks heaps!

By the description of your accident you should not have a problem with your idlers or your pulleys for that matter. The radiator being pushed into the fan to the extent you have described is not likely to have damaged much more than the fan itself and the obvious radiator.

Realistically you should contact the assessor who adjusted your quotes and inspected your vehicle. Motor vehicle assessors are ex tradesmen and will generally know what they are on about. Simply tell him what you were told and have him put it to your insurer FOR YOU.

If you want to be successful you will have to know what you are actually talking about, hopefully this is where the assessor can step in and voice his opinion to the insurer.

Realistically to damage that idler pulley you would need to have the car in a totally non drivable state. The radiator would have to be pushed back do far it squashes all the belts and pulleys onto the motor. That would be more consistent with hitting a car (or a TRUCK) rather than a kangaroo. It definitely doesnt sound like this happened and it seems you simply purchased a car with a noisy belt. Having only owned it for a day it is fair to say you knew SFA about the cars condition, having sat for a month at the repairers would also let any WD40 that might have been sprayed on the noisy component also dry up.

Best advice, save your money and wear it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...