Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/11/17/3068895.htm

Just as bad as getting a ticket for having a For Sale sign on your car - classed as a Movable Sign? What about those cars with company logos?

Governments and Councils have gone mad!

if you read it closely they only know the car was photographed with wedding ribbons on so incase it was getting used for profit or as a unregistored business they have sent a letter, if it was a case of just helping out family or a friend then that is fine

if you read it closely they only know the car was photographed with wedding ribbons on so incase it was getting used for profit or as a unregistored business they have sent a letter, if it was a case of just helping out family or a friend then that is fine

Not sure I believe that. Sounds like they're backpedalling with a piss weak excuse.

I'd like to see a copy of the formal letter they're sending, just to clarify. But if it is how it sounds, they really do need to get a fkn life!

Its all crap. They have to rewrite the whole act.

According to the act and the transport minister if you drive from here to melb with a mate and you split the cost of fuel then you can get charged.

GG gov.

Australian laws regarding vehicles have to be the bloody worst in the world.

Our government is full of tight ass f**k heads that will fine you for anything now.

Every other country seems to be so relaxed about vehicle laws, I don't get why this country makes a car owner feel like a damn murderer.

I swear to god I could cut my neighbours head off with a kitchen knife and face less penalty than if I went onto a main intersection of the town and did one donut at 1am.

What a joke!!! that is so stupid, believe the government I think the government is broke because they are doing anything they can to squeeze money out of people now. What pathetic excuse to get money. I pick up my friends parents and my friend all the time does that mean I am running a transport passenger service. Man the government is losing the plot!!!!!!

Reminds me of the new outdoor drinking laws where a guy was drinking outside a licenced premises in Rundle Street.

He was sitting down and drinking a beer but when he stood up, a cop passing by booked him because he was still holding the glass.

Cop told him the glass must remain on the table when you're not seated...........well how do you get the glass of beer out there in the first place then???? ;)

lol read the lame excuse given by the Minister for Transport..."This is just really about ensuring public safety if some of these vehicles are going out, [ensuring] that some of these vehicles are roadworthy."

Uh huh, so using them for a wedding means they're somehow more unroadworthy than other cars on the road??

I swear to god I could cut my neighbours head off with a kitchen knife and face less penalty than if I went onto a main intersection of the town and did one donut at 1am.

+1 Its friggin stoopid, Australian road laws are so unbalanced im suprised you cant get a fine for farting in your car with the windows down. At this rate maybe its the next thing on the list.

As for cutting your neighbours head off, you dont get demerit ponts for that. ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...