Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is the story, I recently got my car tuned. I took it home and the car was running weird. I call my tuner right away and he said it was becuase of my coilpacks and said there is nothing else he can do. So I played around with my Power FC and I found out tuner, tuned it with rb25 AFM's causing it to heavily misfire at high RPM's. My car has Z32 AFM's so when I swtiched it on my Power FC. The misfire's went away and the car runs great. I would like to know if my car is possibly running LEAN or RICH and is it safe to be running the car with a tune meant for RB25 AFM's. The car made 302KW on the dyno on 1.1bar, (with MISFIRE). Lastly should I ask tuner to re-tune my car without charging me?

Any input would be appreciated. Thank in advance.

Edited by jdm538
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/346430-tuned-with-wrong-afm-help/
Share on other sites

really 302kw on 14psi, what mods?

i dont think i would trust that tuner if he tunes with incorrectly set AFM's.

1.1bar = 16psi

This is my build thread with parts list.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Gt...ri-t340007.html

I just worried if I am running lean on high boost.

Edited by jdm538

my Bad, sorry, i mis read the boost.

just read the build you went all out, well done, so are the turboes definately -5's? you will need atleast 20 psi to see some big numbers,

What compression did you build the motor too?

my Bad, sorry, i mis read the boost.

just read the build you went all out, well done, so are the turboes definately -5's? you will need atleast 20 psi to see some big numbers,

What compression did you build the motor too?

stock compression, yes they are -5. I was hoping to hit atleast 20psi but he said not to boost over 19psi.

Thanks

Edited by jdm538

fyi if he has datalogit or power excel you can edit the "AFMs" in the powerfc and you can rescale them to your hearts content. ie you can could make the stock BNR32s perform the same as Z32s by copying the ramp values.

its likely this hasn't occured in your case as he would have said that, and the idle wouldnt change when choosing different AFM ramp, but technically with datalogit it is possible to tune with the wrong AFM and edit the ramps. why you would do this, no idea, but it can be done

he used a computer based program I am not sure which one. The car idled perfectly at 1k and everything ran well up until 4k, then the misfire would cause hicups. When he unlocked the Powerfc and switched it to Z32 AFM no more hicups. I asked him if the car is ok with the tune. He keeps telling me air/fuel is good and should be fine if I do not boost over 19psi. I dont know if I should believe him.

I'll post up dyno sheet with afr asap.

Edited by jdm538
fyi if he has datalogit or power excel you can edit the "AFMs" in the powerfc and you can rescale them to your hearts content. ie you can could make the stock BNR32s perform the same as Z32s by copying the ramp values.

its likely this hasn't occured in your case as he would have said that, and the idle wouldnt change when choosing different AFM ramp, but technically with datalogit it is possible to tune with the wrong AFM and edit the ramps. why you would do this, no idea, but it can be done

yup like what i have for nismo afms... cut and paste and hey presto.

like your saying you could cut and paste the z32 voltage table into the std afm table and it should be fine.

in fact you can run any afm provided you have the volt scale, used a few lightning afms in the past on bigger setups.

too hard to tell, only way is to check on the dyno

if it was tuned on RB25, leave it on that, dont change it then trash it around

your just asking to kill something

leave it how it was, plonk it on a dyno and check the AFR/s etc

my old tuner set my stock AFMs like above on my old GTR and it made 419KW

if my AFM's max out on my current GTR im gonna try this, much cheaper,

why doesnt everyone do this instead of buying Z32's? i understand the sizing difference of the body but surely the sizing of the stock AFM's could handle pretty big power.

ah it doesnt quiet work like that, when you hit 5v on the AFM, you hit 5v and it cant physically measure any more air

there is a difference between running out of load cells and maxing the AFM (5v).

when you hit the 5v limit you have two options

a) replace with higher flowing unit

b) pan out the cells as best you can run be stuck with a 1d tune (map sensor style) when you peak the AFM - your only load increase axis is RPM

you can't edit the powerfc settings to make an AFM that hits 5v, magically only reach 4v to "overclock it" or "rescale". recale only affects load rating

I am talking with my tuner tomorrow I hope he retunes my car on the dyno without charging me. He just kept telling me my fuel and timing is fine and I shouldnt worry. After hearing your opinions I think I will have another talk with him about my tune.

thanks everyone

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...