Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone,had a prang in my laurel and now I'm parting it out

rb25det s2,round 130k,major service done,always ran well,super reliable

comes complete,from the fan to the clutch everything included for bolt in and start

$1450

rb25 gearbox,nismo short shifter.only slight crunch into 5th at very high revs.nice tight box...

$1200 no clutch,or$1350 with HD exedy clutch near new.will chuck in a brand new thrust bearing to

Nismo 2 way diff,excellent condition nice and tight in housing ready to slap in

$700 Ono

s14 bilsteins coilovers,18 months old.lowered on tein springs.

$500 full set

turbo back 3 inch exhaust,advance front/dump pipe.34gtr cat and a cannon out back.very close to legal 90db,had it tested at exhaust tech at 89.3db.should be able to rebend hangers and fit to something else

$150

must sell this gear and get the shell out of my shed

price are fair I think,but if your genuine then make me an offer,buy in bulk and save

numbers 0421754575 if you have any questions or offers

located in Adelaide

peace out

Rodney

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/349465-wrecking-laurel-quality-parts-sa/
Share on other sites

Apparently the half shafts and the rear hat on the diff can be switched over to suit most application,r200 housing

gearbox and exedy clutch is sold as is all associated parts for manual conversion

plenty of calls and pm's,just nobody showing up with cash..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...