Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello

I´am started to put a stagea rb25det 4x4 engine in my skyline R32 (rb20det) to RWD.

Anyone know what the difference between the two engines are, the stagea rb25det and the skyline rb25det?

And what I must do to get it to fit?

Regards René

i think its exact same engine, just the stagea apparently has a slightly different size block for the awd (its wider down bottom for the awd sump)

otherwise same thing, bit for bit.

235hp turbo??? maybe the s1 but not the s2

they all run the same engine specs as all the normal skylines. so i highly doubt there is any diff in performance, but saying that, i havent taken my one for a dyno run to confirm that

Ok, not including 260RS's..

Series 1 C34 Stageas run a series 2 R33 engine.

Series 2 C34 Stageas run the R34 Neo engine (with some minor differences for 4WD, i.e. no TCS).. by far the better option!

The 4WD blocks are tapped for both RWD and 4WD sumps.

As for being thicker in places, no idea.

Edited by bubba

wow, tapped for both sumps. thats cool, my mates gtr block got that done too when he put it into his 4 door skyline.

when i take my engine apart in the stagea, ill measure it up to the 26 block i have in my kitchen see if its same dimensions

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ah ok. I seem to be mixing it like everyone else does so not sure what's happening. Will experiment with it more.
    • Depends on what you mean by OK. First up, was this done cold or hot? Are they reasonably consistent? Yes, they are reasonably consistent. Could be better. But unless it has had a build at some point, it is a ~30 year old engine and you'd expect some variation. Some of the difference could also be in user technique Is it good compression? Well....not numerically, no. New they were >160 psi. The one at 140 would be fine, in that context. If they were all ~140, you'd be reasonably happy. But the one that is @120 is twice as far down from the original numbers as the one @ 140. But.. (again)... technique can play a part in the absolute magnitude of these numbers, and the quality/state of repair/accuracy of the pressure gauge is not known. In the context of the above, the compression tester that was used last on my car is regularly compared to a known good pressure gauge. Not calibrated, exactly, but compared to a reference instrument that is not used for any other purpose, so cops no abuse. So we can trust the measurements off that tester. But another tester in the same workshop wasn't being compared against the standard and was reading a good 30ish psi lower. When you're reading 100 psu but the engine is really doing 130, you can make bad decisions.
    • More likely from tiny bubbles in the filler/putty. Maybe be less aggressive when mixing it. Perhaps invest in a vacuum chamber to pull the air bubbles out?** **I don't know if this is a thing for body filler. I see hardcore epoxy makers degassing their mixed resin on the regular.
    • IIRC, the speedo on these is fed from the sensor in/on the snout of the diff.
    • They were. I bought the AWD for experimenting but racing it would disqualify or disadvantage me from a few race classes. Def getting a FWD for racing.
×
×
  • Create New...