Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

My stagea is 4WD turned RWD, Previous owner had the front driveshaft removed I believe.

I'm thinking about fitting wheels which are:

18*8.5 +22 on the front and 18*9.5 +35 on rears. 225/35 on fronts and 245/40 on rears

Will this be fine to run considering I'm RWD?

Thank you.

Edited by gersfan
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/353381-stagea-staggered-fitment/
Share on other sites

Hi Rohan,

mate as long as rolling dia are same,should be sweet,

& as you may have read no need to pull front shaft,

Bubba is running RWD at moment with shaft in,

Good luck with small sidewall on WA`S poor roads,

how is he doing this? there is NO way you can safely run in rwd without pulling the shaft!

Bullshit. I've been running mostly in RWD since a couple of weeks before Powercruise. I have posted this up time and time again, if you refuse to believe, that's your problem but don't scaremonger.

Rohan, you want to run something like 225/40 and 245/35 to try keep the rolling diameter the same.. if you know what tyres you will be using, do a bit of research and match up some front and rears.

e.g. I run Federal 595's, if I was going to stagger I would go (depending on rim width) 255/35ZR18 90W 633mm OD and 225/40ZR18 88W 635mm OD

I think ATTESA can handle up to 5% difference before it flips out.

http://www.federaltyres.com.au/tyres/high-performance/595

18"

215/35ZR18 84W RF 606 7.0- 8.5 500

225/35ZR18 83W 613 7.5- 9.0 487

255/35ZR18 90W 633 8.5-10.0 600

265/35ZR18 93W 641 9.0-10.5 650

215/40ZR18 85W 629 7.0- 8.5 515

225/40ZR18 88W 635 7.5- 9.0 550

235/40ZR18 91W 643 8.0-9.5 615

245/40ZR18 93W 651 8.0- 9.5 650

225/45ZR18 91W 658 7.0- 8.5 615

245/45ZR18 96W 676 7.5-9.0 710

255/45ZR18 103Y XL 687 8.0- 9.5 875

235/50ZR18 101W XL 692 6.5- 8.5 825

255/55R18 109V XL 735 7.0- 9.0 1030

I ran staggered offsets with it still being 4wd. 8.5 +22 and 9.5 +25's. It was fine. Ijust ran 235/45s front and rear.

If your's is an auto, you will struggle to get a 9.5 +35 to fit. I run +22 and without camber arms it touched the coilover body on big bumps.

I ran staggered offsets with it still being 4wd. 8.5 +22 and 9.5 +25's. It was fine. Ijust ran 235/45s front and rear.

If your's is an auto, you will struggle to get a 9.5 +35 to fit. I run +22 and without camber arms it touched the coilover body on big bumps.

Manual, I'm probably just going to get them and if I have problems I'll change the tires so that diameter is the same.

Thank you everyone.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
×
×
  • Create New...