Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No it wouldn't work.

If you really want to spend some money, get a plazaman or hypertune RB20 plenum that sits on the factory RB20 runners.

The RB26 plenum conversion from the results I've seen on a mates RB25 was horribly expensive and not many gains.

Also dont forget to factor in the cost of making up new piping to the intercooler on the intake side.

Nismo or Plazmaman. Nismo if you like the old school cast styling or you can spend roughly the same and get a f**king awesome looking (and performing) polished stainless plenum and throttle body. I'm ordering my Plazmaman soon, looking forward to it immensley. 20% Power gain is usually typical. I've got 230rwkw with the stock plenum....go figure :thumbsup:

FYI an RB26DETT plenum is designed for an RB26DETT engine.

Spend your money on a bigger snail, cams and a good tune first

All the plenum is good for is making your engine bay look pretty

If you have all the other big power mods, an aftermarket plenum gives a good performance gain mate.

Nismo or Plazmaman. Nismo if you like the old school cast styling or you can spend roughly the same and get a f**king awesome looking (and performing) polished stainless plenum and throttle body. I'm ordering my Plazmaman soon, looking forward to it immensley. 20% Power gain is usually typical. I've got 230rwkw with the stock plenum....go figure :thumbsup:

FYI an RB26DETT plenum is designed for an RB26DETT engine.

Have you not read all the posts saying that changing the plenum on a Rb20 is the same as setting fire to $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ you WILL lose 20% power not gain any.

Have you not read all the posts saying that changing the plenum on a Rb20 is the same as setting fire to $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ you WILL lose 20% power not gain any.

You won't lose 20% power.. it should actually flow slightly better up top so there might be an increase in peak power. Will probably LOSE at least 20% torque down low though.

Have you not read all the posts saying that changing the plenum on a Rb20 is the same as setting fire to $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ you WILL lose 20% power not gain any.

zebra, you seem to target me regularly with negative comments. kindly stop it.

  • 1 month later...

i would say no, unless its done correctly you will lean out some of the cylinders. It was designed to have the t/b in the centre and by moving it you change where/how the air flows.

Had a mate with a very high powered (at the time) r33 that tryed this and poped the motor.

If you want a cheapish forward facing plenum for an RB20 then just do what I did, cut an RB20 lower manifold up and weld a GTR plenum chamber to the runners.

It doesn't line up perfectly but the RB20 runners are bigger than the RB26 runners so after some heating/bending of the 1st and last runners on the RB20 side, a happy medium was found between the two sides.

See if this guy can make you something up if your deadset on a forward facing plenum

http://customplenums.com/site/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1

He's also on the forums but I can't remember his username.

Good quality shit but I think they have a price to suit :/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...