Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what gear was 18psi at 3000 on ya gt? My GTX is prob 3800 @ 21psi second gear internal gated on 98 :whistling:

yeah im thinkg bout the .82 external wastegate 56t on bp98 i used to have a 3071 that made 280rwkw on 18psi but wasnt a very big pull but now i have a different rb25 which is alot healthier

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

yeah im thinkg bout the .82 external wastegate 56t on bp98 i used to have a 3071 that made 280rwkw on 18psi but wasnt a very big pull but now i have a different rb25 which is alot healthier

mate if you want an easy 300 go the kando t67

it is arguably similar in response to a 56T 3076 but is $800 delivered and actually gets about 330kw on 20psi

800 will buy you a 3076 housing... its good value and theres a massive thread on them now. please read it.

I think the T67 is a fantastic turbo but needs an external wastegate and really should have an aftermarket exhaust manifold compared to the 3076 which does not need either so puts it really in the next category up.

never really updated this. well here it was as of a few weeks ago. currently sourcing bigger gate springs and going e85 in the next week or so

Interesting on your graph - it almost looks like the 56T is actually surging around the 3000rpm mark.

My GT3040 (the 600hp one) did a similar thing, wasn't quite as severe but it also started to ramp, drop away a little, and then re-ramp again.

It was *barely* audible unless in specific conditions, but it was hurting the performance none the less.

Did you notice any surge around that point with the 56T? It's certainly not known for it!

Be interesting to compare our setups once mine is on E85 next week as our setups are similar :thumbsup: when are you seeing full boost and what size are your injectors mate?

Ive got 850cc injectors a tomei pump and a GTX3071R internal gated

Full boost in 4th is about 3200. Didnt change at all when I went e85. And I'm using nismo 740cc and Bosch 044 pump.

Nismoid; Mines the 52t. I don't notice any surging

The comparo graph though (from page 3) the blue line vs the red line.

Ah mis-read, so it was a 52T just a housing change.

The blue graph has very "suspect" dips that usually come with surge as mine was exactly the same, interesting either way :)

If ya didnt notice then might have just been tune or something.

yep.

also it seems its down about 20rwkw at the 3080rpm marker over both other set ups.

Martin did say it kept wheel spinning around the 3000rpm mark, would that do it also.?

Well wheelspin would cause those dips

But it shouldn't be turning tyres if strapped right or the ramp rate gets changed to suit

This tune was done on federal RSRs. The last one on potenza re001s that were a lot wider.

The only thing that's changed between then is the fuel and the rear tyres. And last time it had no dips. Might just go back with the potenzas and see how it goes

  • 3 weeks later...

in the interest on science, and because i love changing turbos, i recently pulled off the 52t .63 rear and put on a 56t .63 rear just to see what the difference was for the turbo coming on, with unsurprising results. The difference seems to be negligible with boost coming on 150rpm earlier back to back. same dyno etc.

next step is to go to a .82 rear and see if that will solve the surge issue. as the .63 really didnt like it when i went e85 and whacked some boost into it

will be doing this next week

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks for posting, your engine bay looks tops. I'm fairly sure you posted the wrong video though, I think you were supposed to upload the one from your "private test road" where it's banging off the limiter with the gate open?
    • This is something to be careful of. I did a bit of digging on the NM35, as I spend a lot of time on near brand new cars and CANBus related stuff, which uses the same "OBD2" plug for a fair chunk of making my life easy. The NM35, does NOT support OBD2. The data pin is actually on Pin3, which is a manufacturer specific pin, and requires Consult3 to connect to the NM35. Your low voltage, is either because the NM35 doesn't have 12V to the constant power pin on the J1962 (OBD2) connector, OR, it is attempting the standard comms, (CanBus, K Line, etc) and can't see any voltage on those pins. Some people have had success accessing SOME data from the vehicle on OBD2 specification, using a module that supports KPW. My assumption, like Duncan has stated, it will likely actually be JOBD, where there is some cross over with the OBD2 and JOBD standards. Note, lots of "OBD2" dongles, do NOT support KPW, which is what you need for a lot of Japanese vehicles of this era (And even up until recent years!), EG, Subaru, Suzuki, etc.    The end of this thread is probably worth a read, as some people did find a way to get a display up in the NM35 recently, looks like someone implemented all the stuff needed to make it work. (The right protocols).  
    • Depending on the purpose of the car, and how much more fabbing you want to do, and what clearances you have, you could look to raise the motor, which will raise the front diff up. Likely would mean altering the chassis rails etc etc, hence the more fab work you'd need to do. However, this can create issues, not just in clearance with everything fitting under the bonnet, but you've also raised a LOT of weight up in the car, and this will DEFINITELY alter handling characteristics (But, so will how much weight you've already added to the front end). You'll also have to deal with the fact the gearbox to rear diff is now out of alignment too for the tail shaft, and alter the angle of the diff, or deal with a bit of potential vibration. Raising the motor an inch up, is effectively the same as making the whole car sit higher by not lowering it as far. So one inch higher motor, theoretically means you can drop the car an extra inch lower, and maintain the same angles in the CVs. Again, depends on the purpose of the car. If it's a just cruiser on the street car, maybe won't be an issue. If it's meant to be a time attack car, I can see you not wanting to raise the motor. This is just for you to ponder as an idea.
    • Have you not seen geospy.ai? It can now give GPS co ords to within a metre from a photo, even if it's a random photo you take inside. Supposedly at the moment only the government/law enforcement has access to that... Supposedly...
    • I've got the rear ones, they're certainly beefy. I need to take them to my driveshaft guru to check over, he's very fussy about the quality of components so I'll let you know if they are made of cheese by a blind man.   Are you in Australia? A mate just had a set of EN26 shafts made for his K20 Lotus by our fabricator which were quite cheap (compared to Driveshaft Shop) so if you can procure the CV's and draw what you need he'd make them for ~$800 for the pair.
×
×
  • Create New...