Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I need to know if anyone has had any bad experiences ( performance wise ) after rebuilding an RB20DET especially with regards to forged pistons or having head work done on an RB20DET ?

I've just had my engine rebuilt with 40 thou oversize forgies and port / polish work on the head and now with more boost, fuel etc. the car's making less power on the dyno than it did before the rebuild. Nothing else has been changed.

I'm stumped. :confused:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35899-rb20-rebuild-questions/
Share on other sites

As far as I know it was checked while the car was on the dyno and all was well.

I think I might triple check it myself because it and the crank angle sensor are the only things that I can think of at the moment that might be the problem ( outside of the rebuild ).

What was done in the way of head work? Also was the compression ratio changed with the forged pistons?

Its possible that the thing wont make the same amount of power depending on what was done with regards to headwork/std cams, drop in compression, change in weight of reciprocating mass etc etc.

Same Dyno???

Roy & Joel,

Yes it was the same dyno and there was nothing really done apart from the head was ported ( mainly above the valve area, polished up somewhat, and the seats were cut to a larger size.

Other than that the only things that were done were the balancing of the bottom end and a set of Arias forged pistons ( 40 thou oversized ).

I asked them about the possibility of compression ratio drop and I pretty much got a blank expression and I did tell them 3 times throughout the build that I did not want monster power. Just wanted more torque and a bit more power than standard but I think they've gone overboard. I've got a horrid gut feeling that another head will be required to fix this problem because I don't have the money for cams, bigger turbo, more dyno time etc, etc. :P

That's a distinct possibility in my opinion but that's what I'm either trying to prove or disprove so I know if I can either place the blame back on the engine builder and get him to fix it ( since I specifically told him/them that I wanted a build that would make the most of what I had but would not require more $'s in the future to make the build work ). I have put it to the builder and he swears that it should all work fine. Guess again.............

That's why I'm looking for someone who's built an RB20DET in much the same way as me and is running a GT2530, injectors, and a programmed ECU and see if any similar problems occured.

So frustrating...........

Could very well be a drop in compression ratio thats doing it. Perhaps get the details of the Purchase order of the mechanic and chase Rocket / Arias with the purchase order no in hand and get the details of the piston that was supplied.

Then do the calcs of what the compression ratio should now be.

Can a drop in compression ration make that much difference ??????

The engine builders are going to do a difference check between stock pistons a nd the ones I got to see what the difference will be.

I've never done a cylinder volume test before ( from memory ). How's it done ?

Assuming that the engine actually has a lower CR, what would be the fix ?

A bigger turbo ?

Its fairly easy to get a rough idea where the comp ratio is at.

Pop down to the library pull out a gregory's or similiar Car manual, anything a ford falcon.

Have a look at what the psi should be then check the compression ratio. It may say something like 155psi 9:1cr.

Then do the math, test your compression. You may get 140psi.

So... 9/155psi = 0.0581

Then 140 * 0.0581 = 8.1CR.

Thats just an example. I have no idea if 155psi = 9:1.

I did that when I first got my R32 and it came up to exactly 8.5:1.

I also used a EL Ford Falcon manual to get the initial figures from.

I'm not sure if its possible but can the block be decked while the bits that go round and round are installed?!? Shave the head?!? Thinner Head gasket??

Also for every .5of a CR you drop you will need to run an extra ~2.9psi to make the same power.

Joel,

Thanks for that info. Will try to figure it out. Got this horrid feeling that there's going to be a huge brawl in getting this all sorted :D

I don't know about the other points you proposed but I guess I'm going to have to look at those options now.

Gee's it's not like I can even get a bigger turbo and run more boost since there's a standard head gasket fitted.

Thanks for that RedDrifter.

So if I'm correct, a stock RB20DET should have a compression ratio of 8.5:1 and 140psi on a compression test. With that in mind I'll do a comp test on mine and do the formular.

In the event that my comp ratio is down and I should choose to go a bigger turbo, does anyone have an opinion on what I should use ?? ( Considering the head work and 40 thou oversized forgies )

Good thing I am going to do most off the stuff myself.

I intend going with tomei 2.2 pistons, tomei 260duration 8.5mm lift cams and tomei valve springs for reliablity up in the revs. Oh yeah 550cc injectors and GT2835.

I have every intention taking a good 12 months to complete this project. That way I won't notice the cost so much. As for the bearings etc and gaskets will go genuine nissan.

FAT32, just rip the head off and machine the face a little to bump up the compression, IF thats the problem.

Oh and you are making less power... what ECU are you running, if its std, and the same tune as before then that could very well be the source of the power loss, you have changed the breathing characteristics of the engine

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...