Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Your dyno graphs on the previous page.. the run where you dropped the cat.. looks like it was going on to make a fair bit more power than the runs with the cat still attached...........

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Your dyno graphs on the previous page.. the run where you dropped the cat.. looks like it was going on to make a fair bit more power than the runs with the cat still attached...........

I remember now the test was to verify whether the cat was causing a loss in response, so once that was ruled out, Trent abandoned the run.

I will get another run done without the cat but it doesnt look like a lot more does it?? I supposed hard to say where it will end up.

back to back dyno runs with different sets of cams can give some idea of how a certain cam may/will behave but i would not rely to much on the dyno results.

on road or track testing will provide more accurate data imo.

sure if you have two pretty close sets of cam shafts but one set has longer duration then sure.. it may make some more power up high.. BUT many other factors will effect how it performs in real life applications.

lobe profile. ramp rate. small/large throttle inputs. initial rpm/initial boost at point when WOT is applied. load (higher gear/uphill)

as a rough rule of thumb.. bigger duration will offer more top end power but will come at the price of low down response. so then you can play with lift as well. in my case i didnt go to crazy on duration but opted for huge lift. all this was done in the quest to keep the car snappy on the throttle if the rpm's get a little lower but we still needed the thing to breath and bigger lift obviously helps with this also. As far as i can tell.. big lift usually offers wins across the board but comes at the cost of needing to grind some meat out of your head and needing different valve springs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • This sounds like someone who would have owned an R33 in their past... It's okay, I'm 100% picking up what you're putting down Mark.
    • Just back on what was raised about jacking off the the tow/tie down point on the front of cars. I've used it plenty. I've also watched it on a car where you could see it move the front end of the car. It was like the front end/whole car being tweaked and twisted a bit. I will say, I struggle to find good jacking points on MOST cars. The ones that have good points, I then normally struggle to find a jack tall enough to make the car change height!   One of my go to points for either the jack, or the axel stands though, is either a suspension pickup point, OR a subframe to chassis major bolting point. I actually think its the subframe on my R33 that has a bit of a bend in it, from being jacked in the middle too. However, it could have been one of my many other cars I've had over the years! Or it could also be the from me jacking it up, and the fact the top of the front radiator support isn't there, so it can allow the front of the car to move and bend etc.
    • My apologies. I forgot we were talking about weird beard M series stuff. Had been talking elsewhere with someone about an R33 with similar subject and got confused.
    • Nope, I don't like the look of ND RF, or any ND really, I don't like their faces or arses, why, because of their "modern" lines, the NC, whilst "modernish" has a more rounded shape that I like Well, that's how my overly judgemental eyes see it anyway  
    • Should be more than fine, especially the overall fuel pressure would never exceed 3.5bar (assuming that thing never gets more than 0.5bar of boost in stock form). According to the chart, it's 11amps.
×
×
  • Create New...