Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was reading over an old HPI mag and noticed an article on fitting a pair of Z32 AFM's to a GTR32. Previously the car had 200rwkw@14psi and after the AFM swap they were able to get 260 mainly because of the greater range of resolution and tuning the Z32 offered.

My question is whether any gain could be had on a GTS25t with this AFM, the article said that the ignition maps had to be changed even at idle, all I have at present is an SAFC so would this AFM swap be only for PowerFC equiped cars?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3623-anyone-using-z32-afm/
Share on other sites

I remember that HPI article, I think they said most of the power gains came from the ecu remap and they weren't really sure how much the afm's by themselves would do.

No real need to use it on a 25t unless you're running out of tuning resolution on the current afm. Both are 80mm. S-AFC wouldn't be able to modify the afm signal anyhow, you'd need a rom daughterboard or powerfc.

What mods have you done and what kind of power are you chasing?

When I put the Z32 afm on my car, it ran bulk rich... All the way from idle to redline... This is not just full throttle, but part throttle too, so unless you've got a full ecu to take advantage of that, you'll probably find that your economy will go to *****. Obviously you'll be able to tune your full throttle with teh afc, but part throttle won't work.

The actual diameter of the AFM between the RB25 and the Z32 afm's are both 80mm, so you're not going to have any less restriction by moving up to the z32.

matt

Originally posted by turbomad

I was reading over an old HPI mag and noticed an article on fitting a pair of Z32 AFM's to a GTR32. Previously the car had 200rwkw@14psi and after the AFM swap they were able to get 260 mainly because of the greater range of resolution and tuning the Z32 offered.

My question is whether any gain could be had on a GTS25t with this AFM, the article said that the ignition maps had to be changed even at idle, all I have at present is an SAFC so would this AFM swap be only for PowerFC equiped cars?

i was running a standard rb25 afm on my car. the decision to change came because the stock one was hitting 5.1volt in the midrange. fortunalely i had a powerfc so i could do the change quite easily.

i swopped the afm and altered the setting inthe powerfc. after which it ran perfectly. no problems. obviously it exposed more of the powerfc map and those sections needed some work. wasnt really rocket science to add in the next 2 rows though. now im able to tune the topend with the z32 showing about 4.5 volt by 5500rpm.

powerfc owners may have noticed that the stock afm will only expose up o L16 on the map. the Z32 will show upto L18 and the VH41 will expose the whole map.

i really dont know about the full remap scenario. i flicked the switch and it worked first time.

basicly there is not benefit unless you have maxed out the old one. i didnt get an exact number but its near the 200kw mark that the old one runs out. seems to me to be more that the stock turbo can push so dont worry unless you upgrade.

anonymous.

I'm getting 188rwkw now with the AFM voltage around 5.06 mark.

I'd like to achieve the max amount I can on the standard injectors and ECU, which is 210rwkw so I was told. I'm only running 12psi through the stock turbo now, so maybe I could try 14psi but I fear the AFM would top 5.1v, alternatively I was thinking a different turbo might be the go as I would like to have more rwkw around the 4000-5500 rpm range, rather than only at peak rpm, what turbo can anyone recommend, VG30, HKS2540, GT30 etc....

Also can the SAFC still tune the A/F ratio if the AFM is at 5.1v?

once you hit 5.1v i wouldnt recomend trying to tune further. basicly the ecu has no idea where it is. could be 13psi or maybe it could be 28psi. bad idea. as you go over 5.1 volt you get the lean out / over advance condition which makes engines go bang.

a safc can convert to z32 afm. never done it myself but the manual says its possible. also seems like a bad idea as the stock maps have no good points to be intercepted to.

hks 2530/35/40 are very nice. call around and see if any wreckers have any? for the cost of mangling a vg30 or hi-flowing you may as well spend the extra few hundred and get an hks. going rate is about $2000 i think.

at 215rwkw at 6000rpm i had a duty cycle of 90% on the stock injectors and an afr of 11.5 ignition timing was about 16 degrees - other cars may differ though. if i remember right the afm was maxed out for a while. these numbers were achieved at hybrid and thier dyno seems reasoably accurate. i like thier dyno for tuning cause there is no wheelspin clouding the readings.

I recently fitted a Z32 AFM to my R32 GTSt with great results.... I wasn't maxxing old the old one but it broke so I thought why put another RB20 one in.

I have made my own custom ECU and chip for it.

Results: 170 RWKW before my stock injectors ran out at 1.1 bar.... Custom T3/4 should be good for 1.7 bar....

E-Mail me for more info

Ditto on the 5.1 volts... You can still tune however, it's just difficult because once it hits 5.1v it's pretty much just a guessing game as far as tuning goes... With the powerfc's the stock afm isn't much good because you can't retard any more ignition off because there's no points available. So basically you just have to pick a conservative value for your ignition on load point 20 across the rev range so if the boost does spike, you won't melt a piston.

As mentioned above... Full throttle can, but part throttle would be very rich.

2535 is probably the biggest you'd want to go without getting a compressor/exhaust wheel mismatch... The 2540 is too small on the exhaust side, and take longer to come on boost than they should... They also seem to require a lot more boost to make decent power than the 2535 does. If you can find one, you'd be better off with a 2835R or a 3037... They're both really well matched turbo's, and should make power fairly easily.

When you say that the AFM maxed out, were yuo referring to the RB25 or Z32 item? I've got about 310 rwkw in mine (as seen by a number of forum members), and I think my max AFM voltage was 4.9v...

What sort of turbo setup do you have, and where aboust are you based?

Cheers,

matt

Originally posted by no_name

once you hit 5.1v i wouldnt recomend trying to tune further. basicly the ecu has no idea where it is. could be 13psi or maybe it could be 28psi. bad idea. as you go over 5.1 volt you get the lean out / over advance condition which makes engines go bang.  

a safc can convert to z32 afm. never done it myself but the manual says its possible. also seems like a bad idea as the stock maps have no good points to be intercepted to.  

hks 2530/35/40 are very nice. call around and see if any wreckers have any? for the cost of mangling a vg30 or hi-flowing you may as well spend the extra few hundred and get an hks. going rate is about $2000 i think.  

at 215rwkw at 6000rpm i had a duty cycle of 90% on the stock injectors and an afr of 11.5 ignition timing was about 16 degrees - other cars may differ though. if i remember right the afm was maxed out for a while. these numbers were achieved at hybrid and thier dyno seems reasoably accurate. i like thier dyno for tuning cause there is no wheelspin clouding the readings.

matt, i maxed out the stock rb25 afm and didnt persue the tuning any further as i didnt want to compromise on the part throttle tuning. i havent run the z32 hard yet cause ive had a whole bunch of small propbelms with the car. ive also recently started popping hoses off as ive raised the boost. hopfully next week il try it again with decent boost. ive seen 4.5 though with the z32 meter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...