Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi

hoping you guys can help me out...

I was stupid enough to buy a power FC without a hand commander as i thought i could easily buy a new EL type from an Apexi dealer...

http://www.nengun.com/apexi/power-fc-el-hand-controller

but nobody will give me a straight answer as to whether it will work with my Power FC...

its a ECR33 type... PFC ECR33 010-0914 rocking firmware version 5.10..

got it installed and working with FC datalogit..

the websites all say they are universal and work with all power FC's....

however im pretty sure they wont give me a refund if it doesnt !!

would anyone have a working EL hand commander in the Newcastle Area ?

Cheers

Matt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362845-apexi-power-fc-hand-controller/
Share on other sites

duncan has the new EL hand controller

and it will work on every powerfc expect toyota chaser JZX100 auto

as it has special firmware for all the auto menu's and logic

FCC4 was a complete re-write from apexi to work on the EL display and support all powerfcs including ap eng, pro, and mainstream versions

the only exception as above is the chaser auto version

Are there any other improvements with the new controller other than the EL screen??

duncan has the new EL hand controller

and it will work on every powerfc expect toyota chaser JZX100 auto

as it has special firmware for all the auto menu's and logic

FCC4 was a complete re-write from apexi to work on the EL display and support all powerfcs including ap eng, pro, and mainstream versions

the only exception as above is the chaser auto version

covered in the powerfc faq

differences

- EL screen

- FCC 4 is std version

- supports all powerfc units (except chaser auto)

- FUNCTION SELECT screen is in english (FCC/FCC2/FCC3 have jap characters for on/off)

- EL unit has light sensor like RSM, AVCR, SAFC units

there is also magic art covers avaiable on the nengun site to give your hand controller a coloured cover instead of the plain black

the biggest difference for most users is the better screen and no more "freeze at apexi logo" annoyances (unless you have a chaser auto)

That's good to know thanks Paul.

I've got the normal old style hand controller and the damn brightness of it sucks. It only goes proper normal brightness when i apply pressure on the front of the hand controller housing blargh.

  • Like 1

Hmmm that sounds pretty good... I might see if I can sell mine for something and get one!

covered in the powerfc faq

differences

- EL screen

- FCC 4 is std version

- supports all powerfc units (except chaser auto)

- FUNCTION SELECT screen is in english (FCC/FCC2/FCC3 have jap characters for on/off)

- EL unit has light sensor like RSM, AVCR, SAFC units

there is also magic art covers avaiable on the nengun site to give your hand controller a coloured cover instead of the plain black

the biggest difference for most users is the better screen and no more "freeze at apexi logo" annoyances (unless you have a chaser auto)

  • 11 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...