Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Series 1 (88-)

Grandpa checkered black and cream interior standard.

Front bumper has a centre opening and two equal sized openings to the sides, seperate to the main opening.

Grille is clear, has bars matching the headlights and consists of two equal sized openings.

Taillights are the old 80s looking style with ribs on the outside.

Clear Projector headlights, low beams and high beams on independant projectors.

Series 1A (89)-, same as above, interior was grey or brown as standard, as with series 1 it had other materials available but atleast the standard material wasn't shit.

Bumper is a single opening (equal to the size of all three openings of S1)

Grille is a single opening (letterbox style), matt black.

Series 2 (90-)

As S1a, Better interior again as standard

Centre console and interior 'refined' (smooth single piece centre console on auto's)

Bumper is same as S1a,

The side rubber bumpers and the curve towards the bottom of the doors and quarter panel are different shape and at different level.

Taillights are smooth flat surface type, with black border.

Half clear headlights (clear except for over the projectors and fog lights themselves, which were glazed)

Series 3 (91-94)

Suede interior standard,

As S2,

Bumper is smooth type, has less ridges and curves, the indicators sit lower, etc

Similar tail-lights to S2, but red border.

Normal (non-clear) headlights, high/low beams combined filament.

Grille is the black mesh/chrome centre type, similar to A32.

Series 2 and 3 were available in AWD (Turbo+Auto only) (1990 and 1992)

Series 3 was available in RB25DE (non-VCT)

Series 3 had bullshit luxary spec, woodgrain trim, electric leather seats, 6 stacker cd player, alarm, rear air con, drink cooler, blow job while you drive, etc

That's about all I can remember off the top of my head.

Edited by Nic_A31

Have to disagree slightly. Mine is a Series 3, manufactured in August 1993 according to FAST, yet it's AWD and has the clear projector headlights with separate low/high/fog.

Where does the drink cooler go then? I'd love to get my hands on one of those as the standard single DIN drink holder can be annoying sometimes.

drink cooler went in the glove box, just a little pad thing that 2 cans sit in comfortable, dunno how it goes about cooling them, can probably by the same thing now days that plugs into cigarette lighter.

Didn't know AWD was made in 93.

Just looked up your topic in the members rides section.

Your headlights are definately earlier series.

93 = series 3. Yours has S3 taillights (red border, not black). All series 3 had non-clear headlights.

Atleast, going by these old sales brochures I scored cheap off Yahoo.

Edited by Nic_A31
  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...