Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys just tested the dynolicious ipad app and came up with 238bhp with just a turbo back exhaust and apexi pod with stock boost in very wet conditions, pretty happy with the result, i had the car weight at 1450kg and drivetrian loss at 18% and the road was very flat, how do these results sound?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/367865-dynolicious-test/
Share on other sites

the only reason i tried it is because of a review on youtube

and it seemed pretty accurate, but the dyno never lies,, might book in at black track and get a real reading then do a run at eastern creek, i will post the results

just refrence i found this in the forum,, times seem pretty accurate

first test run:

Actual data from motorplex:

ET: 14.73 @ 158.98kmph

60': 2.54

330': 6.46

660':9.68

1000':12.43

iPhone app data:

ET: 14.75 @ 157.9kmph

60': 2.36

330': 6.34

660':9.60

1000': 12.4

second test run:

Actual data from motorplex:

ET: 14.89 @ 159.32kmph

60': 2.71

330': 6.65

660': 9.83

1000':12.59

iPhone app data:

ET: 15.28 @ 152.9kmph

60': 2.72

330': 6.79

660': 10.06

1000': 12.91

my best run for the night was a 14.45 @99.33 mph, wasnt a good launch or change into 4th either, so i know it can go faster

i dont think failed can be deemed as an accurate result at this point,,,maybe im just a dumb dumb

i think the HP figure is out though calibration such as drivetrain loss and weight could be a factor, but the 1/4 mile times seem spot on with the real deal,,, im going to test on the dyno and the track after i hit up the weigh bridge before i delete it,,, to many reviews on youtube with good results by reputable sources

i know they are american, though i dont think it's a lie.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...